mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5] Fixes to Xen pciback for 3.17.
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 16:33:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7110555170.20140805163357@eikelenboom.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140805134930.GE13057@laptop.dumpdata.com>


Tuesday, August 5, 2014, 3:49:30 PM, you wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 11:44:33AM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> 
>> Tuesday, August 5, 2014, 11:31:08 AM, you wrote:
>> 
>> > On 05/08/14 09:44, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> Monday, August 4, 2014, 8:43:18 PM, you wrote:
>> >> 
>> >>> On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 04:30:05PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
>> >>>> On 14/07/14 17:18, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> >>>>> Greg: goto GHK
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> This is v5 version of patches to fix some issues in Xen PCIback.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Applied to devel/for-linus-3.17.
>> >> 
>> >>> Thank you.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I dropped the stable Cc for #2 pending a final decision on whether it
>> >>>> really is a stable candidate.
>> >> 
>> >>> OK.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> David
>> >> 
>> >> Hi Konrad / David,
>> >> 
>> >> This series still lacks a resolution on the sysfs /do_flr /reset,
>> >> as a result the pci devices are not reset after shutdown of a guest.
>> >> (no more pciback 0000:xx:xx.x: restoring config space at offset xxx)
>> >> 
>> >> So this series now introduces a regression to 3.16, which causes devices to malfunction 
>> >> after a guest reboot or after assigning the devices to another guest.
>> 
>> > I don't follow what you're saying.  The lack of a device reset for PCI
>> > devices with no FLR method isn't a regression as this has never worked.
>> >  Can you explain in more detail what the regression is and which patch
>> > caused it?
>> 
>> I haven't bisected it to a specific patch in this series,
>> but this patch series (when pulled on top of 3.16) cause the following:
>> 
>> - Do a system start and HVM guest start
>> - HVM guest with pci passthrough, devices work fine
>> - shutdown the HVM guest
>> - "pciback 0000:xx:xx.x: restoring config space at offset xxx" messages do not
>>   appear anymore when shutting down the HVM guest (as they do with vanilla 3.16)
>> - Starting the HVM guest again with the same devices passed through.
>> - Devices malfunction (for example a USB host controller will fail a simple 
>>   "lsusb"
>> - And this all works fine on vanilla 3.16.  

> Hm, the only patch that makes code changes is 63fc5ec97cc54257d1c4ee49ed2131f754a5ff9b
> "xen/pciback: Don't deadlock when unbinding."
> but it does not change any of that code path. Only figures out whether
> to take a lock or not.

> I will try it out on my box and see if I can reproduce it.

> And just to be 100% sure - you are using vanilla Xen? No changes on top
> of it?

BTW could it have anything to do with the do_flr patch that went into Xen:
(http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commitdiff;h=ab78724fc5628318b172b4344f7280621a151e1b)

And isn't into linux yet .. and somehow the old code not having a problem with 
that but the new (after the patch series with the linux do_flr patch) has ?


> Thanks!
>> 
>> >> Apart from that .. i can't resist to remind the other issue with removing pci
>> >> devices passed through to HVM guests related to the signaling via xenstore,
>> >> described in:
>> >> 
>> >> http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-07/msg01875.html
>> 
>> > I don't remember seeing you posting a patch...?

> I was going to, but I think we need to figure out the 'do_flr' mechanism
> first.
>> 
>> > David
>> 
>> 



      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-05 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-14 16:18 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-14 16:18 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] xen-pciback: Document the various parameters and attributes in SysFS Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-28 13:04   ` David Vrabel
2014-07-28 14:56     ` Greg KH
2014-08-01 14:59       ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-07-14 16:18 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] xen/pciback: Don't deadlock when unbinding Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-28 13:06   ` David Vrabel
2014-08-04 18:42     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-05  9:27       ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-07-14 16:18 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] driver core: Provide an wrapper around the mutex to do lockdep warnings Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-14 17:39   ` Greg KH
2014-07-14 16:18 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] xen/pciback: Include the domain id if removing the device whilst still in use Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-14 16:18 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] xen/pciback: Print out the domain owning the device Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-14 16:18 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] xen/pciback: Remove tons of dereferences Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-14 17:40 ` [PATCH v5] Fixes to Xen pciback for 3.17 Greg KH
2014-07-14 17:39   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-01 15:30 ` David Vrabel
2014-08-04 18:43   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-05  8:44     ` [Xen-devel] " Sander Eikelenboom
2014-08-05  9:31       ` David Vrabel
2014-08-05  9:44         ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-08-05 13:49           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-05 14:04             ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-08-06 18:59               ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-08-06 19:18                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-06 19:25                   ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-08-06 19:39                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-06 19:47                       ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-08-06 20:09                         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-06 20:17                           ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-08-06 22:08                             ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-08-07  9:04                       ` David Vrabel
2014-08-25 17:18                         ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-08-05 14:33             ` Sander Eikelenboom [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7110555170.20140805163357@eikelenboom.it \
    --to=linux@eikelenboom.it \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®