* [ANNOUNCE] v7.3-rc4-rt1
@ 2026-09-22 14:41 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-02 4:44 ` Shrikanth Hegde
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior @ 2026-09-22 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner, linux-rt-devel
Cc: LKML, linux-rt-users, Steven Rostedt, Maarten Lankhorst, Shrikanth Hegde
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v7.3-rc4-rt1 patch set.
Changes since v7.2-rt5:
- Rebase to v7.3-rc4
The printk related changes are all gone. What is left in the queue is
PowerPC, i915 and a sysfs file:
- PowerPC
Some progress has been made. What is left is a pseries related MMU
change, a patch dropping KVM_MPIC (which is e500 only) and a stack
protector related workaround.
The stack protector workaround might work with a different fix since
only arch/powerpc is using boot_init_stack_canary().
- i915
The patches in the queue are different compared to what is worked on.
Both sides seem to be stuck. The XE driver seemed to be an alternative
on platforms which are supported. Now that I test it has the same
vblank issues as the i915.
- sysfs file, /sys/kernel/realtime
This file has been around since forever. It was used to "easily"
detect if the PREEMPT_RT patch has been applied and the required
Kconfig symbol has been enabled.
There has been a discussion if this file should be upstreamed, if it
should remain at the same location or if it should become a folder
with features.
Any change here implies that users need to update their scripts. Even
if the file is present in !PREEMPT_RT kernels and returns 0 (as the
file was created with the patch queue applied but CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT nt
selected).
Given that this never part of an upstream kernel, it is probably best to
no include it. The uname(2) interface provides the same information.
I am considering not updating the queue anymore given how much has been
accomplished.
Known issues
- Yoann Congal reported a bit spinlock in dm_exception_table_lock().
https://lore.kernel.org/all/Z8GTjqgDe_5EkE3t@P-ASN-ECS-830T8C3.local
You can get this release via the git tree at:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git v7.3-rc4-rt1
The RT patch against v7.3-rc4 can be found here:
https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/7.3/older/patch-7.3-rc4-rt1.patch.xz
The split quilt queue is available at:
https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/7.3/older/patches-7.3-rc4-rt1.tar.xz
Sebastian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] v7.3-rc4-rt1
2026-09-22 14:41 [ANNOUNCE] v7.3-rc4-rt1 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
@ 2026-10-02 4:44 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-10-02 6:34 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Shrikanth Hegde @ 2026-10-02 4:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior, Thomas Gleixner, linux-rt-devel
Cc: LKML, linux-rt-users, Steven Rostedt, Maarten Lankhorst
On 9/22/26 8:11 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Dear RT folks!
>
> I'm pleased to announce the v7.3-rc4-rt1 patch set.
>
> Changes since v7.2-rt5:
>
> - Rebase to v7.3-rc4
>
> The printk related changes are all gone. What is left in the queue is
> PowerPC, i915 and a sysfs file:
> - PowerPC
> Some progress has been made. What is left is a pseries related MMU
> change, a patch dropping KVM_MPIC (which is e500 only) and a stack
> protector related workaround.
> The stack protector workaround might work with a different fix since
> only arch/powerpc is using boot_init_stack_canary().
>
Thanks Sebastian.
It is nice to see a little progress has been made atleast.
But it was mostly my mistake that I couldn't get time to work on it.
Let me see if we can atleast get these ppc patches upstream.
Most seems sensible to me.
But then would come heavy lifting on function and performance verification.
That's a different beast altogether.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] v7.3-rc4-rt1
2026-10-02 4:44 ` Shrikanth Hegde
@ 2026-10-02 6:34 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior @ 2026-10-02 6:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shrikanth Hegde
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, linux-rt-devel, LKML, linux-rt-users,
Steven Rostedt, Maarten Lankhorst
On 2026-10-02 10:14:51 [+0530], Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> It is nice to see a little progress has been made atleast.
> But it was mostly my mistake that I couldn't get time to work on it.
>
> Let me see if we can atleast get these ppc patches upstream.
> Most seems sensible to me.
>
> But then would come heavy lifting on function and performance verification.
> That's a different beast altogether.
Right. I remember the 32bit ports (e300, e500) were okay and from 64bit
I remember just e6500. I know John has a G4 and he didn't complain :)
So sadly it is almost just Book-E that I had.
The recent testing I did was on qemu (and there I hit the one bug I
reported) so it is just works or !works.
Sebastian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-02 6:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-22 14:41 [ANNOUNCE] v7.3-rc4-rt1 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-02 4:44 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-10-02 6:34 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®