From: Sneh Mankad <sneh.mankad@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Maulik Shah <maulik.shah@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pinctrl: qcom: Unconditionally mark gpio as wakeup enable
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 10:03:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37f34aff-c68f-43ca-b23c-500cc9bb119e@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d9e778ea-8a67-4576-9c96-9cfd859a266a@oss.qualcomm.com>
[...]
>
> This is a much better commit message, thank you!
>
> One question remains - should we set skip_wake_irqs for MPM too?
>
> My understanding is that no, since the MPM HW is simpler and doesn't
> have a register for acking IRQs, so we need to do it from the recipient
> (TLMM). Is that right?
>
Yes that is correct. skip_wake_irqs is set for PDC since PDC can handle interrupts
during active time and SoC sleep time both, so any wakeup capable interrupt source can
be handled via PDC at all times. However MPM can only handle interrupts when
SoC is in low power mode, it does not have the functionality to detect them when SoC
is active. skip_wake_irqs differentiates this behaviour.
Thanks,
Sneh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-25 4:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 11:54 Sneh Mankad
2026-06-18 8:49 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-06-25 4:33 ` Sneh Mankad [this message]
2026-06-25 7:59 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-06-30 11:43 ` Linus Walleij
2026-06-30 14:52 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=37f34aff-c68f-43ca-b23c-500cc9bb119e@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=sneh.mankad@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maulik.shah@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome