mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Richard Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCIe/PM: Do not suspend port if any subordinate device need PME polling
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:03:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3929168.xsIhODq3Fi@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121214051131.GA31440@richard.>

On Friday, December 14, 2012 01:11:31 PM Richard Yang wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:52:11AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> >In
> >
> >  http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-usb@vger.kernel.org/msg07976.html
> >
> >Ulrich reported that his USB3 cardreader does not work reliably when
> >connected to the USB3 port.  It turns out that USB3 controller failed
> >to be waken up when plugging in the USB3 cardreader.  Further
> >experiment found that the USB3 host controller can only be waken up
> >via polling, while not via PME interrupt.  But if the PCIe port that
> >the USB3 host controller is connected is suspended, we can not poll
> >the USB3 host controller because its config space is not accessible if
> >the PCIe port is put into low power state.
> >
> >To solve the issue, the PCIe port will not be suspended if any
> >subordinate device need PME polling.
> >
> >Reported-by: Ulrich Eckhardt <usb@uli-eckhardt.de>
> >Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
> >Tested-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>
> >Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org	# 3.6+
> >---
> > drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c |   18 +++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
> >+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
> >@@ -134,10 +134,26 @@ static int pcie_port_runtime_resume(stru
> > 	return 0;
> > }
> >
> >+static int pci_dev_pme_poll(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
> >+{
> >+	int *pme_poll = data;
> >+	*pme_poll = *pme_poll || pdev->pme_poll;
> >+	return 0;
> >+}
> >+
> > static int pcie_port_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
> > {
> >+	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> >+	int pme_poll = false;
> 
> You want to use int or bool? 
> 
> I think bool is better?

Well, bool would be nicer, but it's not a big deal.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-12-14 22:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-14  2:52 Huang Ying
     [not found] ` <20121214051131.GA31440@richard.>
2012-12-14 23:03   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
     [not found]     ` <50cdc89b.2788440a.0cfe.ffff8fb7SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2012-12-20 21:44       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-12-14 23:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3929168.xsIhODq3Fi@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®