mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>,
	"Hen, Shmulik" <shmulik.hen@intel.com>,
	"'LKML'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'LNML'" <linux-net@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Locking Between User Context and Soft IRQs in 2.4.0
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 12:28:55 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A04B7D7.6B47B503@uow.edu.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07E6E3B8C072D211AC4100A0C9C5758302B27077@hasmsx52.iil.intel.com> <3A03DABD.AF4B9AD5@mandrakesoft.com> <20001104111909.A11500@gruyere.muc.suse.de> <3A042D04.5B3A7946@mandrakesoft.com> <20001104175659.A15475@gruyere.muc.suse.de> <3A044256.D8CD063C@mandrakesoft.com>, <3A044256.D8CD063C@mandrakesoft.com>; from jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com on Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 12:07:34PM -0500 <20001105013809.B21900@gruyere.muc.suse.de>

Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 12:07:34PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > All the MOD_INC/DEC_USE_COUNT are done inside the modules themselves. There
> > > is nothing that would a driver prevent from being unloaded on a different
> > > CPU while it is already executing in ->open but has not yet executed the add
> > > yet or after it has executed the _DEC but it is still running in module code
> > > Normally the windows are pretty small, but very long running interrupt
> > > on one CPU hitting exactly in the wrong moment can change that.
> >
> > Module unload calls unregister_netdev, which grabs rtnl_lock.
> > dev->open runs under rtnl_lock.
> >
> > Given this, how can the driver be unloaded if dev->open is running?
> 
> It does not help, because when the semaphore synchronizes it is already
> too late -- free_module already did the zero module count check and
> nothing is going to stop it from unloading.

aaarrrggh!!!

          CPU0                              CPU1

        rtnl_lock()
         dev_ifsioc()
          dev_change_flags()
           dev_open();
            dev->open();
            vortex_open()
                                        sys_delete_module()
                                        if (!__MOD_IN_USE)
                                         free_module()
                                          mod->cleanup()
                                          vortex_cleanup()
                                           pci_unregister_driver()
            [ time passes ]                 drv->remove();
                                            vortex_remove_one()
                                             unregister_netdev()
                                              unregister_netdevice()
                                              rtnl_lock()        /* blocks */
            ...
            MOD_INC_USE_COUNT;
            ...
        rtnl_unlock()
                                              ...
                                         module_unmap();        /* Not good */


We can't even fix this with a lock_kernel wrapped around
the dev->owner stuff in dev_open(), because the netdevice's
open() can sleep.

<subliminalmessage>prumpf's patch</sumliminalmessage>

Perhaps the best thing to do here is to create a system-wide
semaphore for module unloading. So we do a down()/up()
in sys_delete_module() and do this in dev_open:

        /*
         *      Call device private open method
         */

        down(&mod_unload_sem);                  /* sync with sys_delete_module() */
        if (dev->owner == 0) {
                if (dev->open)
                        ret = dev->open(dev);
        } else {
                if (try_inc_mod_count(dev->owner)) {
                        if (dev->open) {
                                if ((ret = dev->open(dev)) != 0)
                                        __MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT(dev->owner);
                        }
                } else
                        ret = -ENODEV;
        }
        up(&mod_unload_sem);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2000-11-05  1:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-10-30 14:10 Hen, Shmulik
2000-11-04  9:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-04 10:19   ` Andi Kleen
2000-11-04 15:36     ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-04 16:56       ` Andi Kleen
2000-11-04 17:07         ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-05  0:38           ` Andi Kleen
2000-11-05  1:28             ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2000-11-05  1:52               ` Andrew Morton
2000-11-05  2:32               ` Andi Kleen
2000-11-05  3:39               ` Keith Owens
2000-11-05  3:47                 ` Keith Owens
2000-11-05 11:45                   ` Andrew Morton
2000-11-06  2:20                     ` Paul Gortmaker
2000-11-06  9:55                       ` Andrew Morton
2000-11-06 10:05                         ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-06 12:37                           ` Keith Owens
2000-11-06 12:49                             ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-06 12:58                               ` Keith Owens
2000-11-06 13:09                                 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-06 13:18                                   ` Keith Owens
2000-11-07  2:23                         ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3A04B7D7.6B47B503@uow.edu.au \
    --to=andrewm@uow.edu.au \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shmulik.hen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®