From: Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>,
"Hen, Shmulik" <shmulik.hen@intel.com>,
"'LKML'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"'LNML'" <linux-net@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Locking Between User Context and Soft IRQs in 2.4.0
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 12:28:55 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A04B7D7.6B47B503@uow.edu.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07E6E3B8C072D211AC4100A0C9C5758302B27077@hasmsx52.iil.intel.com> <3A03DABD.AF4B9AD5@mandrakesoft.com> <20001104111909.A11500@gruyere.muc.suse.de> <3A042D04.5B3A7946@mandrakesoft.com> <20001104175659.A15475@gruyere.muc.suse.de> <3A044256.D8CD063C@mandrakesoft.com>, <3A044256.D8CD063C@mandrakesoft.com>; from jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com on Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 12:07:34PM -0500 <20001105013809.B21900@gruyere.muc.suse.de>
Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 12:07:34PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > All the MOD_INC/DEC_USE_COUNT are done inside the modules themselves. There
> > > is nothing that would a driver prevent from being unloaded on a different
> > > CPU while it is already executing in ->open but has not yet executed the add
> > > yet or after it has executed the _DEC but it is still running in module code
> > > Normally the windows are pretty small, but very long running interrupt
> > > on one CPU hitting exactly in the wrong moment can change that.
> >
> > Module unload calls unregister_netdev, which grabs rtnl_lock.
> > dev->open runs under rtnl_lock.
> >
> > Given this, how can the driver be unloaded if dev->open is running?
>
> It does not help, because when the semaphore synchronizes it is already
> too late -- free_module already did the zero module count check and
> nothing is going to stop it from unloading.
aaarrrggh!!!
CPU0 CPU1
rtnl_lock()
dev_ifsioc()
dev_change_flags()
dev_open();
dev->open();
vortex_open()
sys_delete_module()
if (!__MOD_IN_USE)
free_module()
mod->cleanup()
vortex_cleanup()
pci_unregister_driver()
[ time passes ] drv->remove();
vortex_remove_one()
unregister_netdev()
unregister_netdevice()
rtnl_lock() /* blocks */
...
MOD_INC_USE_COUNT;
...
rtnl_unlock()
...
module_unmap(); /* Not good */
We can't even fix this with a lock_kernel wrapped around
the dev->owner stuff in dev_open(), because the netdevice's
open() can sleep.
<subliminalmessage>prumpf's patch</sumliminalmessage>
Perhaps the best thing to do here is to create a system-wide
semaphore for module unloading. So we do a down()/up()
in sys_delete_module() and do this in dev_open:
/*
* Call device private open method
*/
down(&mod_unload_sem); /* sync with sys_delete_module() */
if (dev->owner == 0) {
if (dev->open)
ret = dev->open(dev);
} else {
if (try_inc_mod_count(dev->owner)) {
if (dev->open) {
if ((ret = dev->open(dev)) != 0)
__MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT(dev->owner);
}
} else
ret = -ENODEV;
}
up(&mod_unload_sem);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-05 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-30 14:10 Hen, Shmulik
2000-11-04 9:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-04 10:19 ` Andi Kleen
2000-11-04 15:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-04 16:56 ` Andi Kleen
2000-11-04 17:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-05 0:38 ` Andi Kleen
2000-11-05 1:28 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2000-11-05 1:52 ` Andrew Morton
2000-11-05 2:32 ` Andi Kleen
2000-11-05 3:39 ` Keith Owens
2000-11-05 3:47 ` Keith Owens
2000-11-05 11:45 ` Andrew Morton
2000-11-06 2:20 ` Paul Gortmaker
2000-11-06 9:55 ` Andrew Morton
2000-11-06 10:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-06 12:37 ` Keith Owens
2000-11-06 12:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-06 12:58 ` Keith Owens
2000-11-06 13:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-06 13:18 ` Keith Owens
2000-11-07 2:23 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A04B7D7.6B47B503@uow.edu.au \
--to=andrewm@uow.edu.au \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shmulik.hen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®