mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* using TOS as a key in route cache
@ 2000-11-30 22:36 Rajeev Bector
  2000-12-04 10:42 ` Helge Hafting
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rajeev Bector @ 2000-11-30 22:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel


Guys
 I am looking for a reason as to why we want
to have different route cache entries for
different IP ToS types. Does anyone have
any insight into this ?

thanks

-- Rajeev

(please cc replies to rajeev@akamai.com)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: using TOS as a key in route cache
  2000-11-30 22:36 using TOS as a key in route cache Rajeev Bector
@ 2000-12-04 10:42 ` Helge Hafting
  2000-12-04 18:23   ` Rajeev Bector
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Helge Hafting @ 2000-12-04 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rajeev Bector, linux-kernel

Rajeev Bector wrote:
> 
> Guys
>  I am looking for a reason as to why we want
> to have different route cache entries for
> different IP ToS types. Does anyone have
> any insight into this ?

Because you may want to route time-critical stuff like
video through a dedicated fast network and slow stuff like email
through another.  Such a setup prevents an email burst from 
disrupting video.

There are many similiar uses.

Helge Hafting
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: using TOS as a key in route cache
  2000-12-04 10:42 ` Helge Hafting
@ 2000-12-04 18:23   ` Rajeev Bector
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rajeev Bector @ 2000-12-04 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Helge Hafting; +Cc: Rajeev Bector, linux-kernel

Hello
 Thanks for your reply. But this can create problems
in some of the cases. For example, "scp" over TCP
starts with TOS 0, then goes to 8 (bulk data). What
happens is that when RTOs are cached, they are
updated for TOS 8 and not for TOS 0, therefore a
new connection does not pick up the cached RTO.

Does this make sense ?

Thanks,
-- Rajeev
(Again, please cc replies to rajeev@akamai.com)

On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Helge Hafting wrote:

> Rajeev Bector wrote:
> > 
> > Guys
> >  I am looking for a reason as to why we want
> > to have different route cache entries for
> > different IP ToS types. Does anyone have
> > any insight into this ?
> 
> Because you may want to route time-critical stuff like
> video through a dedicated fast network and slow stuff like email
> through another.  Such a setup prevents an email burst from 
> disrupting video.
> 
> There are many similiar uses.
> 
> Helge Hafting
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2000-12-04 18:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-11-30 22:36 using TOS as a key in route cache Rajeev Bector
2000-12-04 10:42 ` Helge Hafting
2000-12-04 18:23   ` Rajeev Bector

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®