* Weird bug in kernel (invalid operand?)
@ 2001-05-21 20:11 Carlos Laviola
2001-05-22 12:52 ` Andrew Morton
2001-05-23 2:39 ` Carlos Laviola
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Carlos Laviola @ 2001-05-21 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I was getting the file ias9i_linux.tar from
http://xxx:yyy@download-east.oracle.com/otn/linux/ias/9ias/ias9i_linux.tar
(username and password masked to protect the innocent) and decided to take
a peek at the contents of that (huge) file, using "tar xfv ias9i_linux.tar".
After a few moments, wget segfaulted. I tried to continue the download, using
wget -c yada yada yada, and it locks up, becoming an unkillable process (i.e.
I had to reboot to get rid of the thing). I could reproduce this with another
downloader, who gave me this error:
setting resume on existing file `ias9i_linux.tar' at 1087947248 bytes
http://xxx:yyy@download-east.oracle.com/otn/linux/ias/9ias/ias9i_linux.tar (1233930K)
ias9i_linux.tar [#################### ] 1062448K | 255.89K/sinvalid operand: 0000
CPU: 0
EIP: 0010:[<c48fb709>]
EFLAGS: 00010282
eax: 00000019 ebx: 00000000 ecx: c1272000 edx: c3f7bc20
esi: 00206c60 edi: c3ca5240 ebp: c0695aa0 esp: c1273e68
ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
Process snarf (pid: 324, stackpage=c1273000)
Stack: c48fe965 c48fea27 00000045 000001f0 00000200 00040d8c c1273ec0 c012cf56
c3ca5240 00206c60 c0695aa0 00000001 000001f0 c1273f64 00040d8c 000002e5
c0605000 c0695aa0 00000200 00206c60 00000000 c0695aa0 0000004b 0000004b
Call Trace: [<c48fe965>] [<c48fea27>] [<c012cf56>] [<c012d553>] [<c48fb6ac>] [<c48fcf1c>] [<c48fb6ac>]
[<c012179a>] [<c48fb7d2>] [<c48fb7b0>] [<c012ac5a>] [<c0106a63>]
Code: 0f 0b 83 c4 0c b8 fb ff ff ff eb 6d 8b 87 8c 00 00 00 0f b7
Segmentation fault
This seems to be a bug in the kernel, maybe because the file is too big,
and VFAT partitions don't like that. I don't have any other operating
systems here I can test this on, but I could try installing FreeBSD or
downgrading the kernel to 2.2.19 (I'm running 2.4.4) to attempt to trigger
this bug again. But, I'd like to ask some knowledgeable person to take a
look at that error above to tell me what the hell is going on. I get a
similar error when I strace wget (since this one doesn't give any weird
errors, just locks up).
Please Cc: to me, I'm not subscribed to this list atm.
Thank you,
Carlos.
--
_ _ _| _ _ | _ . _ | _ carlos.debian.net Debian-BR Project
(_(_|| |(_)_) |(_|\/|(_)|(_| uin#: 981913 (icq) debian-br.sf.net
Linux: the choice of a GNU generation - Registered Linux User #103594
Traveller: God has been mighty good to your fields, Mr. Farmer.
Farmer: You should have seen how he treated them when I wasn't
around.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: Weird bug in kernel (invalid operand?)
2001-05-21 20:11 Weird bug in kernel (invalid operand?) Carlos Laviola
@ 2001-05-22 12:52 ` Andrew Morton
2001-05-23 2:39 ` Carlos Laviola
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2001-05-22 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos Laviola; +Cc: linux-kernel
Carlos Laviola wrote:
>
> invalid operand: 0000
> CPU: 0
> EIP: 0010:[<c48fb709>]
> EFLAGS: 00010282
> eax: 00000019 ebx: 00000000 ecx: c1272000 edx: c3f7bc20
> esi: 00206c60 edi: c3ca5240 ebp: c0695aa0 esp: c1273e68
> ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
> Process snarf (pid: 324, stackpage=c1273000)
> Stack: c48fe965 c48fea27 00000045 000001f0 00000200 00040d8c c1273ec0 c012cf56
> c3ca5240 00206c60 c0695aa0 00000001 000001f0 c1273f64 00040d8c 000002e5
> c0605000 c0695aa0 00000200 00206c60 00000000 c0695aa0 0000004b 0000004b
> Call Trace: [<c48fe965>] [<c48fea27>] [<c012cf56>] [<c012d553>] [<c48fb6ac>] [<c48fcf1c>] [<c48fb6ac>]
> [<c012179a>] [<c48fb7d2>] [<c48fb7b0>] [<c012ac5a>] [<c0106a63>]
>
> Code: 0f 0b 83 c4 0c b8 fb ff ff ff eb 6d 8b 87 8c 00 00 00 0f b7
> Segmentation fault
>
> This seems to be a bug in the kernel, maybe because the file is too big,
> and VFAT partitions don't like that.
It used to be that fatfs would hit the second BUG() in fat_get_block()
when a file reaches two gig. But I can't make that happen in testing,
because the s_maxbytes stuff restricts it to 2gig-1. What you *should*
have seen was `wget' locking up because of a different bug :)
Are you sure you got this with 2.4.4? If so, please run the
output through
ksymoops -m System.map < oops-text
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Weird bug in kernel (invalid operand?)
2001-05-21 20:11 Weird bug in kernel (invalid operand?) Carlos Laviola
2001-05-22 12:52 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2001-05-23 2:39 ` Carlos Laviola
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Carlos Laviola @ 2001-05-23 2:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
On Tue, 22 May 2001 22:52:47 +1000, Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au> wrote:
> Carlos Laviola wrote:
> >
> > invalid operand: 0000
[ ... oops here ... ]
> > Segmentation fault
> >
> > This seems to be a bug in the kernel, maybe because the file is too big,
> > and VFAT partitions don't like that.
>
> It used to be that fatfs would hit the second BUG() in fat_get_block()
> when a file reaches two gig. But I can't make that happen in testing,
> because the s_maxbytes stuff restricts it to 2gig-1. What you *should*
> have seen was `wget' locking up because of a different bug :)
>
> Are you sure you got this with 2.4.4? If so, please run the
> output through
>
> ksymoops -m System.map < oops-text
Well, in fact, I was using 2.4.5-pre1 when I had this problem. However, since
it doesn't seem like anything within the VFAT subsystem has changed from 2.4.4
to 2.4.5-pre1, 2.4.4 is probably buggy too. The relevant output from ksymoops
is below.
>>EIP; c48fb709 <[fat]fat_get_block+5d/dc> <=====
Code; c48fb709 <[fat]fat_get_block+5d/dc>
00000000 <_EIP>:
Code; c48fb709 <[fat]fat_get_block+5d/dc> <=====
0: 0f 0b ud2a <=====
Code; c48fb70b <[fat]fat_get_block+5f/dc>
2: 83 c4 0c add $0xc,%esp
Code; c48fb70e <[fat]fat_get_block+62/dc>
5: b8 fb ff ff ff mov $0xfffffffb,%eax
Code; c48fb713 <[fat]fat_get_block+67/dc>
a: eb 6d jmp 79 <_EIP+0x79> c48fb782 <[fat]fat_get_block+d6/dc>
Code; c48fb715 <[fat]fat_get_block+69/dc>
c: 8b 87 8c 00 00 00 mov 0x8c(%edi),%eax
Code; c48fb71b <[fat]fat_get_block+6f/dc>
12: 0f b7 00 movzwl (%eax),%eax
Thanks,
Carlos.
--
_ _ _| _ _ | _ . _ | _ carlos.debian.net Debian-BR Project
(_(_|| |(_)_) |(_|\/|(_)|(_| uin#: 981913 (icq) debian-br.sf.net
Linux: the choice of a GNU generation - Registered Linux User #103594
Shah, shah! Ayatollah you so!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-05-23 2:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-05-21 20:11 Weird bug in kernel (invalid operand?) Carlos Laviola
2001-05-22 12:52 ` Andrew Morton
2001-05-23 2:39 ` Carlos Laviola
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®