* rmap12a slower than rmap11c (mpeg/VCD) @ 2002-01-29 16:25 Hartmut Holz 2002-01-29 17:27 ` Rik van Riel 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Hartmut Holz @ 2002-01-29 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rik van Riel; +Cc: Linux kernel if I play mpeg/VCD with rmap12a, I recognize that rmap12a is slower than rmap11c. (PII 450 MHz - SMP, Matrox G450 - PCI). I think there's nothing to measure. GTV shows with both patches about 25 fps. But what I see on the screen is different Regards Hartmut ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: rmap12a slower than rmap11c (mpeg/VCD) 2002-01-29 16:25 rmap12a slower than rmap11c (mpeg/VCD) Hartmut Holz @ 2002-01-29 17:27 ` Rik van Riel 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Rik van Riel @ 2002-01-29 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hartmut Holz; +Cc: Linux kernel On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Hartmut Holz wrote: > if I play mpeg/VCD with rmap12a, I recognize that rmap12a is slower > than rmap11c. (PII 450 MHz - SMP, Matrox G450 - PCI). I think there's > nothing to measure. GTV shows with both patches about 25 fps. But what > I see on the screen is different It would be interesting if you could show me 10 lines of 'vmstat 5' output with both kernels so I have a better idea of where to start tracking down the problem ... (even if it isn't directly measurable "feeling slower" is a bug I want to fix) kind regards, Rik -- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-01-29 17:27 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2002-01-29 16:25 rmap12a slower than rmap11c (mpeg/VCD) Hartmut Holz 2002-01-29 17:27 ` Rik van Riel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®