mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: Guest section DW: "Re: [PATCH] Fix floppy io ports reservation
       [not found] <1DD095B27B5AD511A0950002557C77E03C4CA4@rinlxch01.nl.resear ch-int.com>
@ 2002-02-08 16:12 ` Anton Altaparmakov
  2002-02-08 18:31   ` Guest section DW: "Re: [PATCH] Fix floppy io portsreservation Gunther Mayer
  2002-02-08 18:40   ` Anton Altaparmakov
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anton Altaparmakov @ 2002-02-08 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: M.Bakker; +Cc: linux-kernel

At 15:43 08/02/02, M.Bakker@research-int.com wrote:
>*       Reply: Guest section DW: "Re: [PATCH] Fix floppy io ports
>reservation" <1110.html>
>Hmmmm... and how do I tell those 12 faithfull  ps/2's (yep the real ones
>:model 31) still running everyday doing their job.....
>I'm afraid I haven't got the heart.......

Even if yours are affected you are unlikely to be wanting to enable PNPBIOS 
support in the kernel for them. And as long as you don't do that everything 
will continue to work as before my patch. The work around for this would be 
for the PNPBIOS driver in the kernel not to reserve ports 0x3f0 and 0x3f1 
on systems without a PNPBIOS. Thus on all recent systems PNPBIOS would take 
over 0x3f0 and 0x3f1 and  the floppy won't care and on really old systems 
PNPBIOS would not do that and hence the floppy will be happy, too, even 
though we don't reserve them. Having said that I am not convinced this is 
worth the effort as on such an old system PNPBIOS won't be doing anything, 
even if you compile it in, except for perhaps reserving ports, as there 
won't be anything supporting PNP in the system anyway...

I would tend to leave is as is (including my patch) until someone steps 
forward and actually shows a case where it breaks. From the comments so far 
I think we will never encounter such a case.

Anton

> >> ports 0x3f0 and 0x3f1 are used on certain PS/2 systems
> >> and on some very old AT clones
> >
> > [PS/2] Can you point me to the code for the PS/2 systems in question?
> > [AT] And we care because?
>You need not worry - these systems have been dead for over fifteen years.


-- 
   "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown
-- 
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Linux NTFS Maintainer / WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/
ICQ: 8561279 / WWW: http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Guest section DW: "Re: [PATCH] Fix floppy io portsreservation
  2002-02-08 16:12 ` Guest section DW: "Re: [PATCH] Fix floppy io ports reservation Anton Altaparmakov
@ 2002-02-08 18:31   ` Gunther Mayer
  2002-02-08 18:40   ` Anton Altaparmakov
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gunther Mayer @ 2002-02-08 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anton Altaparmakov; +Cc: linux-kernel

Anton Altaparmakov wrote:

> Even if yours are affected you are unlikely to be wanting to enable PNPBIOS
> support in the kernel for them. And as long as you don't do that everything
> will continue to work as before my patch. The work around for this would be
> for the PNPBIOS driver in the kernel not to reserve ports 0x3f0 and 0x3f1
> on systems without a PNPBIOS. Thus on all recent systems PNPBIOS would take
> over 0x3f0 and 0x3f1

This is a misunderstanding.

Compiling PNPBIOS into the kernel does _not_ mean 0x3f0 will be reserved.

So the legacy floppy ports are not a PNPBIOS issue on any machine.

-
Gunther


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Guest section DW: "Re: [PATCH] Fix floppy io portsreservation
  2002-02-08 16:12 ` Guest section DW: "Re: [PATCH] Fix floppy io ports reservation Anton Altaparmakov
  2002-02-08 18:31   ` Guest section DW: "Re: [PATCH] Fix floppy io portsreservation Gunther Mayer
@ 2002-02-08 18:40   ` Anton Altaparmakov
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anton Altaparmakov @ 2002-02-08 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gunther Mayer; +Cc: linux-kernel

At 18:31 08/02/02, Gunther Mayer wrote:
>Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
>
> > Even if yours are affected you are unlikely to be wanting to enable PNPBIOS
> > support in the kernel for them. And as long as you don't do that everything
> > will continue to work as before my patch. The work around for this would be
> > for the PNPBIOS driver in the kernel not to reserve ports 0x3f0 and 0x3f1
> > on systems without a PNPBIOS. Thus on all recent systems PNPBIOS would take
> > over 0x3f0 and 0x3f1
>
>This is a misunderstanding.
>
>Compiling PNPBIOS into the kernel does _not_ mean 0x3f0 will be reserved.
>
>So the legacy floppy ports are not a PNPBIOS issue on any machine.

Excellent, in this case were my patch will always work and we are debating 
a non-issue and can stop here (unless I have broken any of the other 
architectures but I don't think I have). (-:

Anton


-- 
   "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown
-- 
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Linux NTFS Maintainer / WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/
ICQ: 8561279 / WWW: http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-02-08 18:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <1DD095B27B5AD511A0950002557C77E03C4CA4@rinlxch01.nl.resear ch-int.com>
2002-02-08 16:12 ` Guest section DW: "Re: [PATCH] Fix floppy io ports reservation Anton Altaparmakov
2002-02-08 18:31   ` Guest section DW: "Re: [PATCH] Fix floppy io portsreservation Gunther Mayer
2002-02-08 18:40   ` Anton Altaparmakov

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®