* [BUG] 2.5.35: fs.o
@ 2002-09-16 14:51 Rolf Eike Beer
2002-09-16 14:59 ` Roberto Nibali
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rolf Eike Beer @ 2002-09-16 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
This happens:
fs/fs.o: In function `flush_old_exec':
fs/fs.o(.text+0x9b1c): undefined reference to `wait_task_inactive'
.config will be send if requested.
Eike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [BUG] 2.5.35: fs.o
2002-09-16 14:51 [BUG] 2.5.35: fs.o Rolf Eike Beer
@ 2002-09-16 14:59 ` Roberto Nibali
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Roberto Nibali @ 2002-09-16 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rolf Eike Beer; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hello,
> fs/fs.o: In function `flush_old_exec':
> fs/fs.o(.text+0x9b1c): undefined reference to `wait_task_inactive'
The following worked for me but I'm not convinced that this is the right
thing (tm):
--- linux-2.5.35/kernel/sched.c Mon Sep 16 04:18:24 2002
+++ linux-2.5.35-ratz/kernel/sched.c Mon Sep 16 13:29:28 2002
@@ -331,8 +331,6 @@
#endif
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-
/*
* wait_task_inactive - wait for a thread to unschedule.
*
@@ -366,7 +364,6 @@
task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
preempt_enable();
}
-#endif
/*
* kick_if_running - kick the remote CPU if the task is running currently.
I think Ingo should check this and take appropriate actions. I could
also be that ../fs/exec.c and others in binfmt* should not call this
wait_task_inactive under UP anymore.
Best regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
--
echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq'|dc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-09-16 14:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-09-16 14:51 [BUG] 2.5.35: fs.o Rolf Eike Beer
2002-09-16 14:59 ` Roberto Nibali
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®