mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Jacobberger <f1j1@xmission.com>
To: andy@ajsoft.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.20 DRM/DRI issue with Radeon
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 07:42:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DEA1FCB.1040603@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021201143233.MIKG4739.fep01-svc.ttyl.com@localhost>

Andy Jefferson wrote:

>>>In the 2.4.20 kernel changelog I see comments about having consistent
>>>DRM modules with XFree4.2.0. I have a Radeon Mobility M6 LY in a Dell
>>>laptop and would like to get DRI working. Whenever I use any 2.4.*
>>>(including 2.4.20) kernel I get the following messages in
>>>/var/log/XFree86.0.log, and DRM is not enabled. Is this supposed to be
>>>working in 2.4.20 ? I am using a Mandrake 8.2 system (except for the
>>>kernel).
>>>(EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIScreenInit failed because of a version mismatch.
>>>[dri] radeon.o kernel module version is 1.1.1 but version 1.2.x is needed.
>>>[dri] see http://gatos.sf.net/ for an updated module
>>>[dri] Disabling DRI.
>>>      
>>>
>
>
>  
>
>>Works for me.
>>Debian GNU/Linux unstable distribution
>>
>>You did enable radeon DRM drivers in the kernel config right? For your
>>chipset and for the Radeon, right?
>>    
>>
>
>Well, yes. I'm getting VERSION CONFLICT messages, and not that there is no radeon.o module. For the record, 
>what I get from dmesg is
>
>Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
>agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 203M
>agpgart: Detected Intel i830M chipset
>agpgart: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0xd0000000
>[drm] AGP 0.99 on Unknown @ 0xd0000000 256MB
>[drm] Initialized radeon 1.1.1 20010405 on minor 0
>
>FWIW I have in the kernel
>
>/dev/agpgart set to Module
>I830M support set to Yes
>Build old DRM 4.0 drivers set to No
>DRM 4.1 ATI Radeon set to Module
>
>So the version of the kernel module is 1.1.1 20010405 (with 2.4.19, AND 2.4.20) , yet the XFree86 drivers need 1.2.* as per the original message in the XFree86.0.log. Why is the kernel using 1.1.1 and not 1.???
>
You need to grab the later drm kernel.

>  
>


  reply	other threads:[~2002-12-01 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-01 14:32 Andy Jefferson
2002-12-01 14:42 ` Frank Jacobberger [this message]
2002-12-01 20:42 ` Joshua Kwan
     [not found]   ` <1038790613.4691.757.camel@cpq>
2002-12-02  2:46     ` Joshua Kwan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-01  9:36 Andy Jefferson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DEA1FCB.1040603@xmission.com \
    --to=f1j1@xmission.com \
    --cc=andy@ajsoft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®