mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: any compressed filesystem suggestion ?
@ 2003-02-04  2:27 Phillip Lougher
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Phillip Lougher @ 2003-02-04  2:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Nicolas.Turro

Nicolas Turro wrote:
 >
 >Hi, we plan to build an NFS archive of old unix close accounts, and we 
are
 >looking for a compressed filesystem since size is more important than 
 >speed  for us. Our requirements are :
 >1- this fs must run on hardware raid (DAC960  Mylex AcceleRAID)
 >2- the archives files will be read-only for users, but we 
 >(administrators)
 >must be able to add files to the archives...
 >
 >Any recomendations ?

 >squashfs doesn't qualify because of 2 ...

Hi,

Append capability is the thing I'm currently adding to Squashfs.  Once 
finished, you'll be able to add new files/directories to the top level 
directory of a previously created filesystem.  As the mksquashfs program 
performs duplicate file checking against the files in the filesystem as 
well as the files being added, this means it will also work as a kind of 
incremental archiving filesystem.

An initial release should be ready in a week (or two depending on free 
time).

Phillip

 >what about e2compress ? http://www.alizt.com/index.html
 >
 >I've heard about block layer compression... is it applicable for us ?
 >Thanks for your advice...
 >
 >N. Turro


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* any compressed filesystem suggestion ?
@ 2003-01-31 13:51 Nicolas Turro
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Turro @ 2003-01-31 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Hi, we plan to build an NFS archive of old unix close accounts, and we are 
looking for a compressed filesystem since size is more important than speed 
for us. Our requirements are :
1- this fs must run on hardware raid (DAC960  Mylex AcceleRAID)
2- the archives files will be read-only for users, but we (administrators) 
must be able to add files to the archives...

Any recomendations ?
squashfs doesn't qualify because of 2 ...
what about e2compress ? http://www.alizt.com/index.html
I've heard about block layer compression... is it applicable for us ? 
Thanks for your advice...

N. Turro
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE+On9lty/HpgyBIboRAmnpAJ9RDqRmxQzKHEZvl6O9UwDSyPbNSACgp98O
lzO7h9I+BJ2FqzrI9RsiEHg=
=tLMr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-02-04  2:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-02-04  2:27 any compressed filesystem suggestion ? Phillip Lougher
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-31 13:51 Nicolas Turro

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®