From: James Harper <james.harper@bigpond.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: PATCH to fix irq sharing and SA_INTERRUPT on x86. please review
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 21:38:09 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E59F611.3020206@bigpond.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 685 bytes --]
further to my email yesterday (to which i've had no response :) i
propose the attached patch to arch/i386/kernel/irq.c. it corrects what i
see as a bug in interrupt handling.
currently if a driver requests SA_INTERRUPT in an interrupt handler, it
is only called with interrupts disabled if it is the first handler in
the list.
my patch modifies setup_irq to put any interrupt with SA_INTERRUPT in
the front of the handler queue (eg before any handlers without the flag).
and also modifies handle_IRQ_event to only enable interrupts when it
hits the first handler with SA_INTERRUPT not set.
the patch is against 2.5.62 and greatly improves stability on my SMP system.
james
[-- Attachment #2: SA_INTERRUPT_fix.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1870 bytes --]
--- linux/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c Wed Feb 12 21:36:34 2003
+++ linux.test/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c Mon Feb 24 21:01:04 2003
@@ -201,11 +201,13 @@
int handle_IRQ_event(unsigned int irq, struct pt_regs * regs, struct irqaction * action)
{
int status = 1; /* Force the "do bottom halves" bit */
-
- if (!(action->flags & SA_INTERRUPT))
- local_irq_enable();
+ int enabled = SA_INTERRUPT;
do {
+ if (~action->flags & enabled) {
+ local_irq_enable();
+ enabled = 0;
+ }
status |= action->flags;
action->handler(irq, action->dev_id, regs);
action = action->next;
@@ -761,23 +763,38 @@
* The following block of code has to be executed atomically
*/
spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock,flags);
- p = &desc->action;
- if ((old = *p) != NULL) {
- /* Can't share interrupts unless both agree to */
- if (!(old->flags & new->flags & SA_SHIRQ)) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock,flags);
- return -EBUSY;
+ if (new->flags & SA_INTERRUPT) {
+ p = &desc->action;
+ old = *p;
+ /* Add SA_INTERRUPT interrupts to the front of the queue
+ * 'cos it's faster than adding them in the middle */
+ if (old) {
+ if (!(old->flags & new->flags & SA_SHIRQ)) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock,flags);
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+ new->next = old;
+ shared = 1;
}
+ *p = new;
+ } else {
+ p = &desc->action;
+ if ((old = *p) != NULL) {
+ /* Can't share interrupts unless both agree to */
+ if (!(old->flags & new->flags & SA_SHIRQ)) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock,flags);
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
- /* add new interrupt at end of irq queue */
- do {
- p = &old->next;
- old = *p;
- } while (old);
- shared = 1;
+ /* add new interrupt at end of irq queue */
+ do {
+ p = &old->next;
+ old = *p;
+ } while (old);
+ shared = 1;
+ }
+ *p = new;
}
-
- *p = new;
if (!shared) {
desc->depth = 0;
next reply other threads:[~2003-02-24 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-24 10:38 James Harper [this message]
2003-02-24 11:09 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E59F611.3020206@bigpond.com \
--to=james.harper@bigpond.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®