From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Poor performance with pcnet32 on SMP
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:34:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E7B5B41.2070308@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0303202346220.3340@skynet>
Mel Gorman wrote:
> I have being noticing some seriously poor network performance with SMP
> enabled. The machine is a xSeries 350 with quad xeon procesors. Under UP,
> I get decent transfer rates but with SMP enabled, it won't get over 2kB/s.
I have the same kind of machine. I've seen the same problems, but
they're intermittent; I haven't been able to really discern a pattern.
I have the feeling that part of the problem may be with the machine on
the other side of the connection.
I have no problems copying between two 2.5.65 machines. In fact, my
speeds are ~10 MBytes/sec. (yes, megabytes)
> I tried binding interrupts to one processor with
>
> echo 1 > /proc/irq/16/smp_affinity
>
> which, according to mail archives fixed the problem for other people, but
> the result is the same. A CVS checkout from a server on the local lan of a
> source tree less than 1MB took over an hour to complete but under UP
> completes in about 2 seconds. This occurs with both 2.4.20 and 2.5.64.
Yeah, kirq was causing that and it _was_ broken for a bit. It should
have been fixed by 2.5.64, though.
> In case it is relevant, the dmesg output related to the card on 2.5.64 is
>
> pcnet32.c:v1.27b 01.10.2002 tsbogend@alpha.franken.de
> pcnet32: PCnet/FAST III 79C975 at 0x2200, 00 02 55 fc 6d 21 assigned IRQ 16.
> eth0: registered as PCnet/FAST III 79C975
> pcnet32: 1 cards_found.
> eth0: link up, 10Mbps, half-duplex, lpa 0x0021
> Module pcnet32 cannot be unloaded due to unsafe usage in include/linux/module.h:457
I'm running on a full-duplex 100Mbps network, so maybe these things have
some kind of issue with 10Mbps. I'll try plugging an old hub in and see
what happens.
Here's mine:
pcnet32.c:v1.27b 01.10.2002 tsbogend@alpha.franken.de
pcnet32: PCnet/FAST III 79C975 at 0x2240, 00 02 55 fc 43 20 assigned IRQ 16.
eth2: registered as PCnet/FAST III 79C975
pcnet32: 1 cards_found.
eth2: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x45E1
--
Dave Hansen
haveblue@us.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-21 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-20 23:54 Mel Gorman
2003-03-21 18:34 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2003-03-25 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2003-03-25 15:45 ` Mel Gorman
2003-03-22 6:30 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E7B5B41.2070308@us.ibm.com \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®