From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Poor performance with pcnet32 on SMP
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:20:51 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0303251433160.18798@skynet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E7B5B41.2070308@us.ibm.com>
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Dave Hansen wrote:
> I have the same kind of machine. I've seen the same problems, but
> they're intermittent; I haven't been able to really discern a pattern.
Neither can I. I did not that sometimes between subsequent boots, I could
get either 300B/s or 7kB/s for no apparent reason.
> I have the feeling that part of the problem may be with the machine on
> the other side of the connection.
>
I tried a few different machines but they are all using a 2.4.x kernel of
some description. It still is a lot more reliable if SMP is disabled.
> Yeah, kirq was causing that and it _was_ broken for a bit. It should
> have been fixed by 2.5.64, though.
>
I'm not sure and I don't have the expertise to track down the problem.
After a session of Devils Guide To Debugging[1], I could not find any
pattern that determined performance. I tried loading the module full
duplex at 100mb (it still resolves to 10mb at half-duplex) and various
combinations of smp_affinity but it still is very poor. Curiously enough,
trying to load it at 100mb and full_duplex makes it perform more
predictably. It's still bad (3 to 7 kB/s), but bad at a consistant level.
I suspect this observation exists purely inside my own head though. I
tried turning off ACPI but it made no difference.
I did note that I get decent performance to a 2.4 UP box that is on the
same subnet as me. I am not sure if it is relevant but the computer I am
getting really bad performance with is on another subnet behind a
firewall even though it is on the same LAN.
I am going to leave it for the moment anyway as I am getting nowhere with
the problem. Thanks for your time and if there is any other suggestions,
I'd be happy to try them out.
Mel
[1] Change things at random until something works
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-25 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-20 23:54 Mel Gorman
2003-03-21 18:34 ` Dave Hansen
2003-03-25 15:20 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2003-03-25 15:45 ` Mel Gorman
2003-03-22 6:30 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.53.0303251433160.18798@skynet \
--to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®