nit picking UDF

nit picking UDF

[David Ford]

ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S4 S4bios S5)
You didn't specify the type of your ufs filesystem

mount -t ufs -o 
ufstype=sun|sunx86|44bsd|old|hp|nextstep|netxstep-cd|openstep ...

 >>>WARNING<<< Wrong ufstype may corrupt your filesystem, default is 
ufstype=old
ufs_read_super: bad magic number
UDF-fs DEBUG fs/udf/lowlevel.c:65:udf_get_last_session: 
CDROMMULTISESSION not supported: rc=-25
UDF-fs DEBUG fs/udf/super.c:1472:udf_fill_super: Multi-session=0
UDF-fs DEBUG fs/udf/super.c:460:udf_vrs: Starting at sector 16 (2048 
byte sectors)
UDF-fs DEBUG fs/udf/super.c:1208:udf_check_valid: Failed to read byte 
32768. Assuming open disc. Skipping validity check
UDF-fs DEBUG fs/udf/misc.c:286:udf_read_tagged: location mismatch block 
256, tag 18 != 256
UDF-fs DEBUG fs/udf/super.c:1262:udf_load_partition: No Anchor block found
UDF-fs: No partition found (1)
found reiserfs format "3.6" with standard journal

Is all this blurbage necessary?  I don't even have a disc in the 'rom 
drive because it causes the kernel to lock up hard on bootup if I do.  
Right at the moment, the 'rom isn't even plugged in.

David

Re: nit picking UDF

[Randy.Dunlap]

> ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S4 S4bios S5)
> You didn't specify the type of your ufs filesystem
>
> mount -t ufs -o
> ufstype=sun|sunx86|44bsd|old|hp|nextstep|netxstep-cd|openstep ...
>
>  >>>WARNING<<< Wrong ufstype may corrupt your filesystem, default is
> ufstype=old
> ufs_read_super: bad magic number
> UDF-fs DEBUG fs/udf/lowlevel.c:65:udf_get_last_session:
> CDROMMULTISESSION not supported: rc=-25
> UDF-fs DEBUG fs/udf/super.c:1472:udf_fill_super: Multi-session=0
> UDF-fs DEBUG fs/udf/super.c:460:udf_vrs: Starting at sector 16 (2048  byte
> sectors)
> UDF-fs DEBUG fs/udf/super.c:1208:udf_check_valid: Failed to read byte
> 32768. Assuming open disc. Skipping validity check
> UDF-fs DEBUG fs/udf/misc.c:286:udf_read_tagged: location mismatch block
> 256, tag 18 != 256
> UDF-fs DEBUG fs/udf/super.c:1262:udf_load_partition: No Anchor block found
> UDF-fs: No partition found (1)
> found reiserfs format "3.6" with standard journal
>
> Is all this blurbage necessary?  I don't even have a disc in the 'rom  drive
> because it causes the kernel to lock up hard on bootup if I do.   Right at
> the moment, the 'rom isn't even plugged in.

Is this with 2.5.66?

I also get an oops during boot on 2.5.66 if I have
  hdc=ide-scsi
on the kernel boot command line.  I have to remove it to boot 2.5.66.
I don't mind editing lilo.conf, but the oops shouldn't be what makes
me edit it.

~Randy