From: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@huawei.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <louhongxiang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: core: cleanup scsi_dev_queue_ready()
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 10:22:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a76730a-d414-c67d-8851-826f86669f2b@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3334a8c-fb48-4b98-8571-8d85cbd4ed1e@acm.org>
On 2023/10/18 5:15, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/15/23 19:08, Wenchao Hao wrote:
>> + /*
>> + * device_blocked is not set at mostly time, so check it first
>> + * and return token when it is not set.
>> + */
>> + if (!atomic_read(&sdev->device_blocked))
>> + return token;
>
> This patch looks like an improvement to me. But I don't think that the
> above comment is useful. I propose to move it into the patch
> description.
>
>> - /*
>> - * unblock after device_blocked iterates to zero
>> - */
>> - if (atomic_dec_return(&sdev->device_blocked) > 0)
>> - goto out_dec;
>> - SCSI_LOG_MLQUEUE(3, sdev_printk(KERN_INFO, sdev,
>> - "unblocking device at zero depth\n"));
>> + /*
>> + * unblock after device_blocked iterates to zero
>> + */
> > + if (scsi_device_busy(sdev) > 1 ||
> > + atomic_dec_return(&sdev->device_blocked) > 0) {
> > + sbitmap_put(&sdev->budget_map, token);
> > + return -1;
> > }
>
> Please make the above comment match the new code, e.g. by changing it
> into the following: "Only unblock if no other commands are pending and
> if device_blocked has decreased to zero".
>
OK, would update.
Thanks.
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-18 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-16 2:08 [PATCH v2 0/2] cleanup patch Wenchao Hao
2023-10-16 2:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: core: cleanup scsi_dev_queue_ready() Wenchao Hao
2023-10-17 21:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-10-18 2:22 ` Wenchao Hao [this message]
2023-10-16 2:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: Add comment of target_destroy in scsi_host_template Wenchao Hao
2023-10-17 21:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-10-18 2:24 ` Wenchao Hao
2023-10-17 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] cleanup patch Wenchao Hao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3a76730a-d414-c67d-8851-826f86669f2b@huawei.com \
--to=haowenchao2@huawei.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=louhongxiang@huawei.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®