From: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@huawei.com>
To: <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Cc: <bsegall@google.com>, <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
<juri.lelli@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<mingo@redhat.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>, <pjt@google.com>,
<vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, <zhangqiao22@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] sched: Dec __cfs_bandwith_used in destroy_cfs_bandwidth()
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 19:20:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b2eb2c6-20d5-9f13-09f9-77f87f333b8d@huawei.com> (raw)
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 04:38:20PM +0800, Zhang Qiao wrote:
>> __cfs_bandwith_uesd is a static_key to control cfs bandwidth
>> feature. When adding a cfs_bandwidth group, we need increase
>> the key, and decrease it when removing. But currently when we
>> remove a cfs_bandwidth group, we don't decrease the key and
>> this switch will always be on even if there is no cfs bandwidth
>> group in the system.
>
> Yep, that's broken.
>
>> Therefore, when removing a cfs bandwidth group, we decrease
>> __cfs_bandwith_used by calling cfs_bandwidth_usage_dec().
>>
>> Fixes: 56f570e512ee ("sched: use jump labels to reduce overhead when bandwidth control is inactive")
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> index 103e31e53e2b..857e8908b7f7 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> @@ -5344,6 +5344,9 @@ static void destroy_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
>> if (!cfs_b->throttled_cfs_rq.next)
>> return;
>>
>> + if (cfs_b->quota != RUNTIME_INF)
>> + cfs_bandwidth_usage_dec();
>
> This calls static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked, but destroy_cfs_bandwidth
> isn't holding the hotplug lock.
>
> The other caller of cfs_bandwidth_usage_dec needs to hold it for another
> reason, so what about having both cfs_bandwidth_usage_dec() and
> cfs_bandwidth_usage_dec_cpuslocked()? In that case, the _inc one could
> be renamed similarly so this isn't a stumbling block later on.
Hi Jordan, thanks for your comments.It is valuable to me.
And i have another thought is that we can hold the
hotplug lock before calling cfs_bandwidth_usage_dec().
This way, fewer modifications are involved.
What do you think about it?
thanks.
>
>> +
>> hrtimer_cancel(&cfs_b->period_timer);
>> hrtimer_cancel(&cfs_b->slack_timer);
>> }
>> --
>> 2.18.0.huawei.25
>>
next reply other threads:[~2021-07-14 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-14 11:20 Zhang Qiao [this message]
2021-07-14 13:22 ` Daniel Jordan
2021-07-15 2:07 ` Zhang Qiao
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-07-06 8:38 Zhang Qiao
2021-07-12 16:26 ` Daniel Jordan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3b2eb2c6-20d5-9f13-09f9-77f87f333b8d@huawei.com \
--to=zhangqiao22@huawei.com \
--cc=20210712162655.w3j6uczwbfkzazvt@oracle.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®