From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>,
Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86/cpu: proc - remove "wp" status line in cpuinfo
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:13:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3bd5980f-19fc-9eb4-477c-4786580ceafb@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486933932-585-4-git-send-email-minipli@googlemail.com>
On 02/12/17 13:12, Mathias Krause wrote:
> As of commit a5c2a893dbd4 ("x86, 386 removal: Remove
> CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK") the kernel won't boot if CR0.WP isn't working
> correctly. This makes a process reading this file always see "wp : yes"
> here -- otherwise there would be no process to begin with ;)
>
> As this status line in /proc/cpuinfo serves no purpose for quite some
> time now, get rid of it.
>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
> index 6df621ae62a7..c6c5217a7980 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
> @@ -30,8 +30,7 @@ static void show_cpuinfo_misc(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> "coma_bug\t: %s\n"
> "fpu\t\t: %s\n"
> "fpu_exception\t: %s\n"
> - "cpuid level\t: %d\n"
> - "wp\t\t: yes\n",
> + "cpuid level\t: %d\n",
> static_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_FDIV) ? "yes" : "no",
> static_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_F00F) ? "yes" : "no",
> static_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_COMA) ? "yes" : "no",
> @@ -45,8 +44,7 @@ static void show_cpuinfo_misc(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> seq_printf(m,
> "fpu\t\t: yes\n"
> "fpu_exception\t: yes\n"
> - "cpuid level\t: %d\n"
> - "wp\t\t: yes\n",
> + "cpuid level\t: %d\n",
> c->cpuid_level);
> }
> #endif
>
Potential userspace breakage, which is why the line was left in the
first place despite its value now being hard-coded. Removing it will
save a whopping 9 bytes of kernel rodata; this is a very small price to
pay for guaranteeing continued compatibility.
Nacked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-14 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-12 21:12 [PATCH 0/6] struct cpuinfo_x86 related cleanups Mathias Krause
2017-02-12 21:12 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86: drop unneded members of struct cpuinfo_x86 Mathias Krause
2017-02-14 16:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-14 16:40 ` Mathias Krause
2017-02-14 17:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-14 18:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-14 18:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-03-11 13:34 ` [tip:x86/cpu] x86/cpu: Drop " tip-bot for Mathias Krause
2017-02-12 21:12 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86/cpu: drop wp_works_ok member " Mathias Krause
2017-03-11 13:34 ` [tip:x86/cpu] x86/cpu: Drop " tip-bot for Mathias Krause
2017-02-12 21:12 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86/cpu: proc - remove "wp" status line in cpuinfo Mathias Krause
2017-02-14 16:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-14 16:47 ` Mathias Krause
2017-02-14 17:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-14 18:13 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2017-02-14 18:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-14 21:42 ` Mathias Krause
2017-02-28 7:15 ` Mathias Krause
2017-02-12 21:12 ` [PATCH 4/6] sparc: remove unused wp_works_ok macro Mathias Krause
2017-02-13 2:48 ` David Miller
2017-02-12 21:12 ` [PATCH 5/6] cris: " Mathias Krause
2017-02-13 9:18 ` Jesper Nilsson
2017-02-12 21:12 ` [PATCH 6/6] m68k: paging_init - remove dead code Mathias Krause
2017-02-13 9:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3bd5980f-19fc-9eb4-477c-4786580ceafb@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jesper.nilsson@axis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=minipli@googlemail.com \
--cc=starvik@axis.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome