[PATCH] phy: mediatek: allow building T-PHY driver for MT7621 MIPS SoC

[PATCH] phy: mediatek: allow building T-PHY driver for MT7621 MIPS SoC

[Shiji Yang]

MT7621 also has compatible T-PHY which attached to the XHCI interface.

Signed-off-by: Shiji Yang <yangshiji66@outlook.com>
---
 drivers/phy/mediatek/Kconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/mediatek/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/mediatek/Kconfig
index ba6461350..fa69df3f1 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/mediatek/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/phy/mediatek/Kconfig
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ config PHY_MTK_XFI_TPHY
 
 config PHY_MTK_TPHY
 	tristate "MediaTek T-PHY Driver"
-	depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST
+	depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK || SOC_MT7621 || COMPILE_TEST
 	depends on OF && OF_ADDRESS
 	depends on HAS_IOMEM
 	select GENERIC_PHY
-- 
2.51.0

Re: [PATCH] phy: mediatek: allow building T-PHY driver for MT7621 MIPS SoC

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 19/02/26 13:53, Shiji Yang ha scritto:
> MT7621 also has compatible T-PHY which attached to the XHCI interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shiji Yang <yangshiji66@outlook.com>

MT7621 seems to be a bit special among the mips/ralink platforms, so I agree.

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>

Re: [PATCH] phy: mediatek: allow building T-PHY driver for MT7621 MIPS SoC

[Vladimir Oltean]

On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 02:47:09PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 19/02/26 13:53, Shiji Yang ha scritto:
> > MT7621 also has compatible T-PHY which attached to the XHCI interface.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Shiji Yang <yangshiji66@outlook.com>
> 
> MT7621 seems to be a bit special among the mips/ralink platforms, so I agree.
> 
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>

I wanted to see for myself, but I didn't find it.

arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi:

	usb: usb@1e1c0000 {
		compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-xhci", "mediatek,mtk-xhci";
		reg = <0x1e1c0000 0x1000
		       0x1e1d0700 0x0100>;
		reg-names = "mac", "ippc";

		#address-cells = <1>;
		#size-cells = <0>;

		clocks = <&sysc MT7621_CLK_XTAL>;
		clock-names = "sys_ck";

		interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
		interrupts = <GIC_SHARED 22 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
	};

Shiji, did you also submit a device tree patch somewhere? Not that
you're required to, for this patch to be accepted. I'm just curious.