From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@amd.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
tony.luck@intel.com, peternewman@google.com
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
hpa@zytor.com, paulmck@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
thuth@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, ardb@kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com,
jpoimboe@kernel.org, alexandre.chartre@oracle.com,
pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
perry.yuan@amd.com, seanjc@google.com, kai.huang@intel.com,
xiaoyao.li@intel.com, kan.liang@linux.intel.com,
xin3.li@intel.com, ebiggers@google.com, xin@zytor.com,
sohil.mehta@intel.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
mario.limonciello@amd.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com,
eranian@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 14/26] x86/resctrl: Add the functionality to assign MBM events
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 09:20:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d31259c-cac0-4b96-883c-6d2e8e427988@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59fbd325-04e8-459f-a724-ae0c4536b1a5@intel.com>
Hi Reinette,
On 4/11/25 16:04, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 4/3/25 5:18 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>> The mbm_cntr_assign mode offers "num_mbm_cntrs" number of counters that
>> can be assigned to an RMID, event pair and monitor the bandwidth as long
>> as it is assigned.
>
> Above makes it sound as though multiple counters can be assigned to
> an RMID, event pair.
>
Yes. Multiple counter-ids can be assigned to RMID, event pair.
>>
>> Add the functionality to allocate and assign the counters to RMID, event
>> pair in the domain.
>
> "assign *a* counter to an RMID, event pair"?
Sure.
>
>>
>> If all the counters are in use, the kernel will log the error message
>> "Unable to allocate counter in domain" in /sys/fs/resctrl/info/
>> last_cmd_status when a new assignment is requested. Exit on the first
>> failure when assigning counters across all the domains.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
>> ---
>
> ...
>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 2 +
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 126 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
>> index 0b73ec451d2c..1a8ac511241a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
>> @@ -574,6 +574,8 @@ bool closid_allocated(unsigned int closid);
>> int resctrl_find_cleanest_closid(void);
>> void arch_mbm_evt_config_init(struct rdt_hw_mon_domain *hw_dom);
>> unsigned int mon_event_config_index_get(u32 evtid);
>> +int resctrl_assign_cntr_event(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
>> + struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, enum resctrl_event_id evtid, u32 evt_cfg);
>
> This is internal to resctrl fs. Why is it needed to provide both the event id
> and the event configuration? Event configuration can be determined from event ID?
Yes. It can be done. Then I have to export the functions like
mbm_get_assign_config() into monitor.c. To avoid that I passed it from
here which I felt much more cleaner.
>
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_RESCTRL_FS_PSEUDO_LOCK
>> int rdtgroup_locksetup_enter(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp);
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> index 77f8662dc50b..ff55a4fe044f 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> @@ -1469,3 +1469,127 @@ int resctrl_arch_config_cntr(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Configure the counter for the event, RMID pair for the domain. Reset the
>> + * non-architectural state to clear all the event counters.
>> + */
>> +static int resctrl_config_cntr(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
>> + enum resctrl_event_id evtid, u32 rmid, u32 closid,
>> + u32 cntr_id, u32 evt_cfg, bool assign)
>> +{
>> + struct mbm_state *m;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = resctrl_arch_config_cntr(r, d, evtid, rmid, closid, cntr_id, evt_cfg, assign);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>
> I understood previous discussion to conclude that resctrl_arch_config_cntr() cannot fail
> and thus I expect it to return void and not need any error checking from caller.
> By extension this will result in resctrl_config_cntr() returning void and should simplify
> a few flows. For example, it will make it clear that re-configuring an existing counter
> cannot result in that counter being freed.
Yea. I missed it. Will take care of it next version.
>
>> +
>> + m = get_mbm_state(d, closid, rmid, evtid);
>> + if (m)
>> + memset(m, 0, sizeof(struct mbm_state));
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>
> Could you please add comments to these mbm_cntr* functions to provide information
> on how the cntr_cfg data structure is used? Please also include details on
> callers since it seems to me as though these functions are called
> from paths where assignable counters are not supported (mon_event_read()).
Sure. Will add details about these functions.
>
>> +static int mbm_cntr_get(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
>> + struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, enum resctrl_event_id evtid)
>> +{
>> + int cntr_id;
>> +
>> + for (cntr_id = 0; cntr_id < r->mon.num_mbm_cntrs; cntr_id++) {
>> + if (d->cntr_cfg[cntr_id].rdtgrp == rdtgrp &&
>> + d->cntr_cfg[cntr_id].evtid == evtid)
>> + return cntr_id;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return -ENOENT;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int mbm_cntr_alloc(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
>> + struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, enum resctrl_event_id evtid)
>> +{
>> + int cntr_id;
>> +
>> + for (cntr_id = 0; cntr_id < r->mon.num_mbm_cntrs; cntr_id++) {
>> + if (!d->cntr_cfg[cntr_id].rdtgrp) {
>> + d->cntr_cfg[cntr_id].rdtgrp = rdtgrp;
>> + d->cntr_cfg[cntr_id].evtid = evtid;
>> + return cntr_id;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return -ENOSPC;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void mbm_cntr_free(struct rdt_mon_domain *d, int cntr_id)
>> +{
>> + memset(&d->cntr_cfg[cntr_id], 0, sizeof(struct mbm_cntr_cfg));
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Allocate a fresh counter and configure the event if not assigned already.
>> + */
>> +static int resctrl_alloc_config_cntr(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
>> + struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, enum resctrl_event_id evtid,
>> + u32 evt_cfg)
>
> Same here, why are both evtid and evt_cfg provided as arguments?
Yes. It can be done. Then I have to export the functions like
mbm_get_assign_config() into monitor.c. To avoid that I passed it from
here which I felt much more cleaner.
>
>> +{
>> + int cntr_id, ret = 0;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * No need to allocate or configure if the counter is already assigned
>> + * and the event configuration is up to date.
>> + */
>> + cntr_id = mbm_cntr_get(r, d, rdtgrp, evtid);
>> + if (cntr_id >= 0) {
>> + if (d->cntr_cfg[cntr_id].evt_cfg == evt_cfg)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + goto cntr_configure;
>> + }
>> +
>> + cntr_id = mbm_cntr_alloc(r, d, rdtgrp, evtid);
>> + if (cntr_id < 0) {
>> + rdt_last_cmd_printf("Unable to allocate counter in domain %d\n",
>> + d->hdr.id);
>
> Please print resource name also.
Sure. We can print r->name.
>
>> + return cntr_id;
>> + }
>> +
>> +cntr_configure:
>> + /* Update and configure the domain with the new event configuration value */
>> + d->cntr_cfg[cntr_id].evt_cfg = evt_cfg;
>> +
>> + ret = resctrl_config_cntr(r, d, evtid, rdtgrp->mon.rmid, rdtgrp->closid,
>> + cntr_id, evt_cfg, true);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + rdt_last_cmd_printf("Assignment of event %d failed on domain %d\n",
>> + evtid, d->hdr.id);
>
> How is user expected to interpret the event ID (especially when looking forward
> where events can be dynamic)? This should rather be the event name.
Sure. We can do that.
>
>> + mbm_cntr_free(d, cntr_id);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Assign a hardware counter to event @evtid of group @rdtgrp. Counter will be
>> + * assigned to all the domains if @d is NULL else the counter will be assigned
>> + * to @d.
>> + */
>> +int resctrl_assign_cntr_event(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
>> + struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, enum resctrl_event_id evtid,
>> + u32 evt_cfg)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + if (!d) {
>> + list_for_each_entry(d, &r->mon_domains, hdr.list) {
>> + ret = resctrl_alloc_config_cntr(r, d, rdtgrp, evtid, evt_cfg);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + ret = resctrl_alloc_config_cntr(r, d, rdtgrp, evtid, evt_cfg);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>
> Reinette
>
--
Thanks
Babu Moger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-15 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-04 0:18 [PATCH v12 00/26] x86/resctrl : Support AMD Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring Counters (ABMC) Babu Moger
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 01/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce mbm_total_cfg and mbm_local_cfg in struct rdt_hw_mon_domain Babu Moger
2025-04-11 20:49 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-14 15:56 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 02/26] x86/resctrl: Remove MSR reading of event configuration value Babu Moger
2025-04-11 20:50 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-14 15:57 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 03/26] x86/cpufeatures: Add support for Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring Counters (ABMC) Babu Moger
2025-04-11 20:52 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-14 17:48 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-15 16:09 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-15 19:43 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-16 16:08 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-17 14:27 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 04/26] x86/resctrl: Add ABMC feature in the command line options Babu Moger
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 05/26] x86/resctrl: Consolidate monitoring related data from rdt_resource Babu Moger
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 06/26] x86/resctrl: Detect Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring feature details Babu Moger
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 07/26] x86/resctrl: Add support to enable/disable AMD ABMC feature Babu Moger
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 08/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce the interface to display monitor mode Babu Moger
2025-04-11 20:56 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-14 19:52 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-15 16:22 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-16 14:05 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 09/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce interface to display number of monitoring counters Babu Moger
2025-04-11 21:01 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-14 20:12 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 10/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce mbm_cntr_cfg to track assignable counters at domain Babu Moger
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 11/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce interface to display number of free MBM counters Babu Moger
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 12/26] x86/resctrl: Add data structures and definitions for ABMC assignment Babu Moger
2025-04-11 21:01 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-14 20:30 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-15 16:30 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-16 15:43 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 13/26] x86/resctrl: Implement resctrl_arch_config_cntr() to assign a counter with ABMC Babu Moger
2025-04-11 21:02 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-14 20:51 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-15 16:38 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-16 15:51 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 14/26] x86/resctrl: Add the functionality to assign MBM events Babu Moger
2025-04-11 21:04 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-15 14:20 ` Moger, Babu [this message]
2025-04-15 16:53 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-16 17:09 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-16 17:55 ` Luck, Tony
2025-04-16 18:17 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-16 19:02 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-16 19:29 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 15/26] x86/resctrl: Add the functionality to unassign " Babu Moger
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 16/26] x86/resctrl: Report 'Unassigned' for MBM events in mbm_cntr_assign mode Babu Moger
2025-04-11 21:08 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-15 15:00 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 17/26] x86/resctrl: Add the support for reading ABMC counters Babu Moger
2025-04-11 21:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-15 16:41 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 18/26] x86/resctrl: Add default MBM event configurations for mbm_cntr_assign mode Babu Moger
2025-04-11 21:44 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-15 18:48 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-15 19:25 ` Luck, Tony
2025-04-16 16:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-16 17:26 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-16 16:18 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-16 17:27 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 19/26] x86/resctrl: Add event configuration directory under info/L3_MON/ Babu Moger
2025-04-11 22:04 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-15 20:29 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 20/26] x86/resctrl: Provide interface to update the event configurations Babu Moger
2025-04-11 22:07 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-15 20:37 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-16 18:52 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-17 14:34 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-17 15:09 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-17 20:19 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 21/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce mbm_assign_on_mkdir to configure assignments Babu Moger
2025-04-11 22:08 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-15 20:39 ` Moger, Babu
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 22/26] x86/resctrl: Auto assign/unassign counters when mbm_cntr_assign is enabled Babu Moger
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 23/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce mbm_L3_assignments to list assignments in a group Babu Moger
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 24/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce the interface to modify " Babu Moger
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 25/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce the interface to switch between monitor modes Babu Moger
2025-04-04 0:18 ` [PATCH v12 26/26] x86/resctrl: Configure mbm_cntr_assign mode if supported Babu Moger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d31259c-cac0-4b96-883c-6d2e8e427988@amd.com \
--to=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=xin3.li@intel.com \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®