mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Mohammed Gamal <mgamal@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	paul.durrant@citrix.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	vkuznets@redhat.com, otubo@redhat.com, cavery@redhat.com,
	cheshi@redhat.com, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-netfront, xen-netback: Use correct minimum MTU values
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:19:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3da3d5ae-c2cb-380e-368d-a90432608cf1@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171016150522.nebui653rkjove7r@citrix.com>

On 10/16/2017 11:05 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:20:32PM +0200, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
>> RFC791 specifies the minimum MTU to be 68, while xen-net{front|back}
>> drivers use a minimum value of 0.
>>
>> When set MTU to 0~67 with xen_net{front|back} driver, the network
>> will become unreachable immediately, the guest can no longer be pinged.
>>
>> xen_net{front|back} should not allow the user to set this value which causes
>> network problems.
>>
>> Reported-by: Chen Shi <cheshi@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamal <mgamal@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
>
> CC netfront maintainers


Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>

I can take it via Xen tree unless there are objections.

-boris

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-16 20:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-16 13:20 Mohammed Gamal
2017-10-16 14:43 ` Eduardo Otubo
2017-10-16 15:05 ` Wei Liu
2017-10-16 20:19   ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2017-10-16 20:22     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3da3d5ae-c2cb-380e-368d-a90432608cf1@oracle.com \
    --to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=cavery@redhat.com \
    --cc=cheshi@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgamal@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=otubo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®