* [PATCHv2] mm/huge_memory: set the mmu_gather page size in zap_huge_pud()
@ 2026-10-30 0:07 Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-10-30 2:11 ` Zi Yan
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) @ 2026-10-30 0:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm, Andrew Morton
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan, Venkat Rao Bagalkote, linux-kernel,
linuxppc-dev, David Hildenbrand, Muchun Song, Zi Yan,
Baolin Wang, Ritesh Harjani (IBM),
Pavithra
Unmapping a device-dax mapping with 1G alignment on powerpc radix kernel
built with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM triggers this warning on every munmap:
WARNING: mm/mmu_gather.c:176 at __tlb_remove_folio_pages_size+0x38/0x230
NIP [c00000000063d508] __tlb_remove_folio_pages_size+0x38/0x230
LR [c0000000006fb688] zap_huge_pud+0x1b8/0x2d0
Call Trace:
zap_huge_pud+0x170/0x2d0 (unreliable)
__zap_vma_range+0x1604/0x1e20
unmap_vmas+0xa0/0x1f0
unmap_region+0xb0/0x130
vms_complete_munmap_vmas+0x120/0x310
do_vmi_align_munmap+0x1ec/0x240
__vm_munmap+0x148/0x220
sys_munmap+0x28/0x40
To trigger this - it is enough to mmap() /dev/dax0.0, touch the first
byte so that the whole 1G is mapped by a single PUD and then munmap()
it.
PowerPC needs MMU_GATHER_PAGE_SIZE in which mmu_gather needs to record
the page size for which tlb flush is needed. zap_huge_pmd(),
zap_pte_range(), change_huge_pud() etc all do this already. However,
since commit:
dbe54153296d ("mm/huge_memory: add vmf_insert_folio_pud()")
a device-dax PUD maps a real folio and zap_huge_pud() now hands it to
tlb_remove_page_size(tlb, page, HPAGE_PUD_SIZE). At that point
tlb->page_size is still whatever the previous user left behind, which is
0 for the fresh gather set up by munmap() and so the check fires.
Fix this in the same way like how other similar paths do.
Fixes: dbe54153296d0 ("mm/huge_memory: add vmf_insert_folio_pud()")
Reported-by: Pavithra <pavrampu@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
---
[v1]->v2:
=========
- Split the 2 part patch series. Patch-1 is now superseded by a different patch
from Muchun which he already posted [2].
- No difference in this patch from v1.
[v1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/97f85592bb78a273be8519e6897e7f9b9bd31469.1793070429.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261029063601.1961415-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com/
mm/huge_memory.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index bd44d58e8684..7e589a2fb02d 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3040,6 +3040,8 @@ int zap_huge_pud(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
spinlock_t *ptl;
pud_t orig_pud;
+ tlb_change_page_size(tlb, HPAGE_PUD_SIZE);
+
ptl = __pud_trans_huge_lock(pud, vma);
if (!ptl)
return 0;
--
2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2] mm/huge_memory: set the mmu_gather page size in zap_huge_pud()
2026-10-30 0:07 [PATCHv2] mm/huge_memory: set the mmu_gather page size in zap_huge_pud() Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
@ 2026-10-30 2:11 ` Zi Yan
2026-10-30 2:21 ` Muchun Song
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zi Yan @ 2026-10-30 2:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
Cc: linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Madhavan Srinivasan,
Venkat Rao Bagalkote, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
David Hildenbrand, Muchun Song, Baolin Wang, Pavithra
On 29 Oct 2026, at 20:07, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> Unmapping a device-dax mapping with 1G alignment on powerpc radix kernel
> built with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM triggers this warning on every munmap:
>
> WARNING: mm/mmu_gather.c:176 at __tlb_remove_folio_pages_size+0x38/0x230
> NIP [c00000000063d508] __tlb_remove_folio_pages_size+0x38/0x230
> LR [c0000000006fb688] zap_huge_pud+0x1b8/0x2d0
> Call Trace:
> zap_huge_pud+0x170/0x2d0 (unreliable)
> __zap_vma_range+0x1604/0x1e20
> unmap_vmas+0xa0/0x1f0
> unmap_region+0xb0/0x130
> vms_complete_munmap_vmas+0x120/0x310
> do_vmi_align_munmap+0x1ec/0x240
> __vm_munmap+0x148/0x220
> sys_munmap+0x28/0x40
>
> To trigger this - it is enough to mmap() /dev/dax0.0, touch the first
> byte so that the whole 1G is mapped by a single PUD and then munmap()
> it.
>
> PowerPC needs MMU_GATHER_PAGE_SIZE in which mmu_gather needs to record
> the page size for which tlb flush is needed. zap_huge_pmd(),
> zap_pte_range(), change_huge_pud() etc all do this already. However,
> since commit:
> dbe54153296d ("mm/huge_memory: add vmf_insert_folio_pud()")
>
> a device-dax PUD maps a real folio and zap_huge_pud() now hands it to
> tlb_remove_page_size(tlb, page, HPAGE_PUD_SIZE). At that point
> tlb->page_size is still whatever the previous user left behind, which is
> 0 for the fresh gather set up by munmap() and so the check fires.
>
> Fix this in the same way like how other similar paths do.
>
> Fixes: dbe54153296d0 ("mm/huge_memory: add vmf_insert_folio_pud()")
> Reported-by: Pavithra <pavrampu@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> ---
> [v1]->v2:
> =========
> - Split the 2 part patch series. Patch-1 is now superseded by a different patch
> from Muchun which he already posted [2].
> - No difference in this patch from v1.
>
> [v1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/97f85592bb78a273be8519e6897e7f9b9bd31469.1793070429.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com/
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261029063601.1961415-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com/
>
> mm/huge_memory.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
Makes sense. Thanks.
Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2] mm/huge_memory: set the mmu_gather page size in zap_huge_pud()
2026-10-30 0:07 [PATCHv2] mm/huge_memory: set the mmu_gather page size in zap_huge_pud() Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-10-30 2:11 ` Zi Yan
@ 2026-10-30 2:21 ` Muchun Song
2026-10-30 6:46 ` pavrampu
2026-10-30 9:00 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Muchun Song @ 2026-10-30 2:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
Cc: linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Madhavan Srinivasan,
Venkat Rao Bagalkote, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
David Hildenbrand, Zi Yan, Baolin Wang, Pavithra
> On Oct 30, 2026, at 08:07, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Unmapping a device-dax mapping with 1G alignment on powerpc radix kernel
> built with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM triggers this warning on every munmap:
>
> WARNING: mm/mmu_gather.c:176 at __tlb_remove_folio_pages_size+0x38/0x230
> NIP [c00000000063d508] __tlb_remove_folio_pages_size+0x38/0x230
> LR [c0000000006fb688] zap_huge_pud+0x1b8/0x2d0
> Call Trace:
> zap_huge_pud+0x170/0x2d0 (unreliable)
> __zap_vma_range+0x1604/0x1e20
> unmap_vmas+0xa0/0x1f0
> unmap_region+0xb0/0x130
> vms_complete_munmap_vmas+0x120/0x310
> do_vmi_align_munmap+0x1ec/0x240
> __vm_munmap+0x148/0x220
> sys_munmap+0x28/0x40
>
> To trigger this - it is enough to mmap() /dev/dax0.0, touch the first
> byte so that the whole 1G is mapped by a single PUD and then munmap()
> it.
>
> PowerPC needs MMU_GATHER_PAGE_SIZE in which mmu_gather needs to record
> the page size for which tlb flush is needed. zap_huge_pmd(),
> zap_pte_range(), change_huge_pud() etc all do this already. However,
> since commit:
> dbe54153296d ("mm/huge_memory: add vmf_insert_folio_pud()")
>
> a device-dax PUD maps a real folio and zap_huge_pud() now hands it to
> tlb_remove_page_size(tlb, page, HPAGE_PUD_SIZE). At that point
> tlb->page_size is still whatever the previous user left behind, which is
> 0 for the fresh gather set up by munmap() and so the check fires.
>
> Fix this in the same way like how other similar paths do.
>
> Fixes: dbe54153296d0 ("mm/huge_memory: add vmf_insert_folio_pud()")
> Reported-by: Pavithra <pavrampu@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2] mm/huge_memory: set the mmu_gather page size in zap_huge_pud()
2026-10-30 0:07 [PATCHv2] mm/huge_memory: set the mmu_gather page size in zap_huge_pud() Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-10-30 2:11 ` Zi Yan
2026-10-30 2:21 ` Muchun Song
@ 2026-10-30 6:46 ` pavrampu
2026-10-30 9:00 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pavrampu @ 2026-10-30 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
Cc: linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Madhavan Srinivasan,
Venkat Rao Bagalkote, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
David Hildenbrand, Muchun Song, Zi Yan, Baolin Wang
On 2026-10-30 05:37, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> Unmapping a device-dax mapping with 1G alignment on powerpc radix
> kernel
> built with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM triggers this warning on every munmap:
>
> WARNING: mm/mmu_gather.c:176 at
> __tlb_remove_folio_pages_size+0x38/0x230
> NIP [c00000000063d508] __tlb_remove_folio_pages_size+0x38/0x230
> LR [c0000000006fb688] zap_huge_pud+0x1b8/0x2d0
> Call Trace:
> zap_huge_pud+0x170/0x2d0 (unreliable)
> __zap_vma_range+0x1604/0x1e20
> unmap_vmas+0xa0/0x1f0
> unmap_region+0xb0/0x130
> vms_complete_munmap_vmas+0x120/0x310
> do_vmi_align_munmap+0x1ec/0x240
> __vm_munmap+0x148/0x220
> sys_munmap+0x28/0x40
>
> To trigger this - it is enough to mmap() /dev/dax0.0, touch the first
> byte so that the whole 1G is mapped by a single PUD and then munmap()
> it.
>
> PowerPC needs MMU_GATHER_PAGE_SIZE in which mmu_gather needs to record
> the page size for which tlb flush is needed. zap_huge_pmd(),
> zap_pte_range(), change_huge_pud() etc all do this already. However,
> since commit:
> dbe54153296d ("mm/huge_memory: add vmf_insert_folio_pud()")
>
> a device-dax PUD maps a real folio and zap_huge_pud() now hands it to
> tlb_remove_page_size(tlb, page, HPAGE_PUD_SIZE). At that point
> tlb->page_size is still whatever the previous user left behind, which
> is
> 0 for the fresh gather set up by munmap() and so the check fires.
>
> Fix this in the same way like how other similar paths do.
>
> Fixes: dbe54153296d0 ("mm/huge_memory: add vmf_insert_folio_pud()")
> Reported-by: Pavithra <pavrampu@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> ---
> [v1]->v2:
> =========
> - Split the 2 part patch series. Patch-1 is now superseded by a
> different patch
> from Muchun which he already posted [2].
> - No difference in this patch from v1.
>
> [v1]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/97f85592bb78a273be8519e6897e7f9b9bd31469.1793070429.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com/
> [2]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261029063601.1961415-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com/
>
> mm/huge_memory.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index bd44d58e8684..7e589a2fb02d 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -3040,6 +3040,8 @@ int zap_huge_pud(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct
> vm_area_struct *vma,
> spinlock_t *ptl;
> pud_t orig_pud;
>
> + tlb_change_page_size(tlb, HPAGE_PUD_SIZE);
> +
> ptl = __pud_trans_huge_lock(pud, vma);
> if (!ptl)
> return 0;
> --
> 2.39.5
Tested on Power10 (ppc64le), kernel v7.3
Tested-by: Pavithra Prakash <pavrampu@linux.ibm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2] mm/huge_memory: set the mmu_gather page size in zap_huge_pud()
2026-10-30 0:07 [PATCHv2] mm/huge_memory: set the mmu_gather page size in zap_huge_pud() Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-10-30 6:46 ` pavrampu
@ 2026-10-30 9:00 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand (Arm) @ 2026-10-30 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ritesh Harjani (IBM), linux-mm, Andrew Morton
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan, Venkat Rao Bagalkote, linux-kernel,
linuxppc-dev, Muchun Song, Zi Yan, Baolin Wang, Pavithra
On 10/30/26 01:07, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> Unmapping a device-dax mapping with 1G alignment on powerpc radix kernel
> built with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM triggers this warning on every munmap:
>
> WARNING: mm/mmu_gather.c:176 at __tlb_remove_folio_pages_size+0x38/0x230
> NIP [c00000000063d508] __tlb_remove_folio_pages_size+0x38/0x230
> LR [c0000000006fb688] zap_huge_pud+0x1b8/0x2d0
> Call Trace:
> zap_huge_pud+0x170/0x2d0 (unreliable)
> __zap_vma_range+0x1604/0x1e20
> unmap_vmas+0xa0/0x1f0
> unmap_region+0xb0/0x130
> vms_complete_munmap_vmas+0x120/0x310
> do_vmi_align_munmap+0x1ec/0x240
> __vm_munmap+0x148/0x220
> sys_munmap+0x28/0x40
>
> To trigger this - it is enough to mmap() /dev/dax0.0, touch the first
> byte so that the whole 1G is mapped by a single PUD and then munmap()
> it.
>
> PowerPC needs MMU_GATHER_PAGE_SIZE in which mmu_gather needs to record
> the page size for which tlb flush is needed. zap_huge_pmd(),
> zap_pte_range(), change_huge_pud() etc all do this already. However,
> since commit:
> dbe54153296d ("mm/huge_memory: add vmf_insert_folio_pud()")
>
> a device-dax PUD maps a real folio and zap_huge_pud() now hands it to
> tlb_remove_page_size(tlb, page, HPAGE_PUD_SIZE). At that point
> tlb->page_size is still whatever the previous user left behind, which is
> 0 for the fresh gather set up by munmap() and so the check fires.
>
> Fix this in the same way like how other similar paths do.
>
> Fixes: dbe54153296d0 ("mm/huge_memory: add vmf_insert_folio_pud()")
> Reported-by: Pavithra <pavrampu@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> ---
> [v1]->v2:
> =========
> - Split the 2 part patch series. Patch-1 is now superseded by a different patch
> from Muchun which he already posted [2].
> - No difference in this patch from v1.
>
> [v1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/97f85592bb78a273be8519e6897e7f9b9bd31469.1793070429.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com/
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261029063601.1961415-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com/
>
> mm/huge_memory.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index bd44d58e8684..7e589a2fb02d 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -3040,6 +3040,8 @@ int zap_huge_pud(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> spinlock_t *ptl;
> pud_t orig_pud;
>
> + tlb_change_page_size(tlb, HPAGE_PUD_SIZE);
> +
> ptl = __pud_trans_huge_lock(pud, vma);
> if (!ptl)
> return 0;
> --
> 2.39.5
>
Matches zap_huge_pmd().
I will wait a bit and then queue this shortly.
This sounds like stable material?
--
Cheers,
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-30 9:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-30 0:07 [PATCHv2] mm/huge_memory: set the mmu_gather page size in zap_huge_pud() Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-10-30 2:11 ` Zi Yan
2026-10-30 2:21 ` Muchun Song
2026-10-30 6:46 ` pavrampu
2026-10-30 9:00 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®