Re: [PATCH next] btrfs: Fix reversed condition in copy_inline_to_page()

[Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>]

Hi Dan,

在 2024/8/27 18:21, Dan Carpenter 写道:
> This if statement is reversed leading to locking issues.
> 
> Fixes: 8e603cfe05f0 ("btrfs: convert copy_inline_to_page() to use folio")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> ---
> This patch is obviously correct but it's from static analysis so additional
> testing would be good as well.
> 
>   fs/btrfs/reflink.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/reflink.c b/fs/btrfs/reflink.c
> index 1681d63f03dd..f0824c948cb7 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/reflink.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/reflink.c
> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static int copy_inline_to_page(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
>   	btrfs_folio_clear_checked(fs_info, folio, file_offset, block_size);
>   	btrfs_folio_set_dirty(fs_info, folio, file_offset, block_size);
>   out_unlock:
> -	if (IS_ERR(folio)) {
> +	if (!IS_ERR(folio)) {
This is a mistake caused by my carelessness,thank you for the patch
>   		folio_unlock(folio);
>   		folio_put(folio);
>   	}

Can I merge your patch into my patchset and add you as a co-author?

Thanks,
Li Zetao.