Re: [PATCH next] btrfs: Fix reversed condition in copy_inline_to_page()

[Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>]

On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 08:53:44PM +0800, Li Zetao wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> 
> 在 2024/8/27 18:21, Dan Carpenter 写道:
> > This if statement is reversed leading to locking issues.
> > 
> > Fixes: 8e603cfe05f0 ("btrfs: convert copy_inline_to_page() to use folio")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > This patch is obviously correct but it's from static analysis so additional
> > testing would be good as well.
> > 
> >   fs/btrfs/reflink.c | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/reflink.c b/fs/btrfs/reflink.c
> > index 1681d63f03dd..f0824c948cb7 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/reflink.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/reflink.c
> > @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static int copy_inline_to_page(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
> >   	btrfs_folio_clear_checked(fs_info, folio, file_offset, block_size);
> >   	btrfs_folio_set_dirty(fs_info, folio, file_offset, block_size);
> >   out_unlock:
> > -	if (IS_ERR(folio)) {
> > +	if (!IS_ERR(folio)) {
> This is a mistake caused by my carelessness,thank you for the patch
> >   		folio_unlock(folio);
> >   		folio_put(folio);
> >   	}
> 
> Can I merge your patch into my patchset and add you as a co-author?

Just merge it.  No need for co-author credit for something tiny like this.  :P

regards,
dan carpenter