From: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Xingui Yang <yangxingui@huawei.com>, <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
<martin.petersen@oracle.com>, <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Cc: <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@huawei.com>, <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
<chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>, <kangfenglong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: libsas: Fix disk not being scanned in after being removed
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 10:13:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4067aa2d-838d-5cd8-5e93-c9c4ade995fc@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f8de67cb-8d0c-475d-b3f3-bc38ff097823@oracle.com>
On 2024/3/7 2:43, John Garry wrote:
> As an aside, could libsas - and your changes here - be simpler if we
> changed smp_execute_task() like this:
>
> static int smp_execute_task(struct domain_device *dev, void *req /* can
> be on the stack */, int req_size,
> void *resp /* can be on the stack */, int resp_size)
> {
> struct scatterlist req_sg;
> struct scatterlist resp_sg;
> int ret;
> void *_req = kmemdup(req, req_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> void *_resp = alloc_smp_resp(resp_size);
> if (!_req || !resp)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> sg_init_one(&req_sg, _req, req_size);
> sg_init_one(&resp_sg, _resp, resp_size);
> ret = smp_execute_task_sg(dev, &req_sg, &resp_sg);
> memcpy(resp, _resp, resp_size);
> kfree(_req);
> kfree(_resp);
> return ret;
> }
>
> We need to use alloc_smp_resp() and alloc_smp_req() as we can't allocate
> these memories on the stack for calling sg_init_one(). But if we changed
> smp_execute_task() to memcpy from/to data on the stack, it might make
> callers simpler. I'm not sure.
Maybe simpler. I have not check all the length of these buffers, but
there is still a risk of stack overflow if the buffer on stack is too
large.
Thanks,
Jason
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-07 2:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-27 9:01 Xingui Yang
2024-03-05 3:00 ` Jason Yan
2024-03-06 18:43 ` John Garry
2024-03-07 2:13 ` Jason Yan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4067aa2d-838d-5cd8-5e93-c9c4ade995fc@huawei.com \
--to=yanaijie@huawei.com \
--cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kangfenglong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
--cc=yangxingui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®