From: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
To: <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, <ohad@wizery.com>, <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patrice.chotard@st.com>,
<hugues.fruchet@st.com>, <peter.griffin@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] remoteproc: st: add virtio_rpmsg support
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 17:29:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40a7f950-980a-2bc5-8a0b-2b457c00d07d@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1487189929-24196-1-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com>
On 02/15/2017 09:18 PM, Loic Pallardy wrote:
> Goal of this series is:
> - to add vring based communication link (virtio_rpmsg)
> - to add rproc_da_to_va translation function to allow firmware loading in
> pre-reserved carveout memory region
>
> V2:
> Only changes in patch 1 to:
> - fix typos
> - fix mailbox allocation per coprocessor
>
> V3:
> - Integrate Bjorn's comments about mailbox support simplification
> - Add missing Signed-of-by
> - Move st_rproc_probe error management correction in a dedicated patch
> - Fix warnings reported by checkpatch --strict
>
> V4:
> - Rebase on maintainer rproc-next branch on which patches 1 & 2 are present
> - Remove check on device address (da) from patch 4
> - Add Acked-by and Tested-by
>
Hi Bjorn,
As discussed during Linaro connect, could you review/accept these 2
patches providing da to pa translation mechanism for firmware loading?
I agree a central solution will better, but today all drivers are based
on this mechanism.
Could we move on this solution to complete remoteproc support for B2260
96board?
Regards,
Loic
> Loic Pallardy (2):
> remoteproc: st: add da to va support
> remoteproc: core: don't allocate carveout if pa is defined
>
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 5 +++++
> drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-03 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-15 20:18 Loic Pallardy
2017-02-15 20:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] remoteproc: st: add da to va support Loic Pallardy
2017-02-15 20:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] remoteproc: core: don't allocate carveout if pa is defined Loic Pallardy
2017-05-03 15:29 ` Loic Pallardy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40a7f950-980a-2bc5-8a0b-2b457c00d07d@st.com \
--to=loic.pallardy@st.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=hugues.fruchet@st.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=patrice.chotard@st.com \
--cc=peter.griffin@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®