From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: Jeffrey Mahoney <jeffm@novell.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander Zarochentcev <zam@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] I/O Error Handling for ReiserFS v3
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 08:44:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4162C156.3030108@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041005150819.GA30046@locomotive.unixthugs.org>
These have received design approval from zam (and thus me), but zam, did
they receive stress testing by Elena under your guidance?
Hans
Jeffrey Mahoney wrote:
>Hey all -
>
>One of the most common complaints I've heard about ReiserFS is how
>graceless it is in handling critical I/O errors.
>
>ext[23] can handle I/O errors anywhere, with the results being up to the
>system admin to determine: continue, go read only, or panic.
>
>ReiserFS doesn't offer the admin any such choice, instead panicking on
>any I/O error in the journal.
>
>The available options are read only or panic, since ReiserFS does not
>currently support operations without the journal.
>
>In the four messages that follow, you'll find:
>* reiserfs-cleanup-buffer-heads.diff
> - Cleans up handling of buffer head bitfields - uses
> the kernel supplied FNS_BUFFER macros instead.
>* reiserfs-cleanup-sb-journal.diff
> - Cleans up accessing of the journal structure, prefering
> to create a temporary variable in functions that access
> the journal structure non-trivially. Should make 0 difference
> at compile time.
>* reiserfs-io-error-handling.diff
> - Allows ReiserFS to gracefully handle I/O errors in critical
> code paths. The admin has the option to go read-only or panic.
> Since ReiserFS has no option to ignore the use of the journal,
> the "continue" method is not enabled.
>* reiserfs-write-lock.diff
> - Fixes two missing reiserfs_write_unlock() calls on error paths
> that are unrelated to reiserfs-io-error-handling.diff
>
>These patches have seen a lot of testing in the SuSE Linux Enterprise
>Server 9 kernel, and are considered ready for mainline.
>
>They've received approval[1] from the ReiserFS maintainers also.
>
>Andrew - Apologies for the previous format; Please apply.
>
>Thanks.
>
>-Jeff
>
>[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfs&m=109587254714180
>
>--
>Jeff Mahoney
>SuSE Labs
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-05 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-05 15:08 Jeffrey Mahoney
2004-10-05 15:44 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2004-10-05 17:22 ` Alex Zarochentsev
2004-10-05 17:40 ` Hans Reiser
2004-10-05 18:21 ` Jeff Mahoney
2004-10-05 18:40 ` Hans Reiser
2004-10-05 15:45 ` Hans Reiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4162C156.3030108@namesys.com \
--to=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jeffm@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zam@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome