From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@novell.com>
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: Alex Zarochentsev <zam@namesys.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] I/O Error Handling for ReiserFS v3
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 14:21:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4162E61F.5000103@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4162DCAA.50902@namesys.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hans Reiser wrote:
| Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
|
|> On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 08:44:22AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
|>
|>
|>> These have received design approval from zam (and thus me), but zam,
|>> did they receive stress testing by Elena under your guidance?
|>>
|>
|>
|> No. We have a long queue of test tasks. There are fsck.reiser4 testing,
|> reiser4/dmapper crashes and the benchmarks in the queue.
|>
| Well, we cannot let our process be a barrier to good patches getting in,
| so let me ask, Jeff, did you test each of these conditions you
| improved? How? Did anyone else test them?
The "testing" version of the code had a another conditional added to
each of the !buffer_update tests that allowed me to trigger an I/O error
handling at each error point. The I/O error path is obviously more
difficult to test in real-world conditions as I/O errors could be caused
by any number of failures.
The testing was done using fsx-linux, the LTP fsstress program, and
stress.sh, sometimes all at once.
This code has also been active in the SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 9
kernel for some time and has seen real-world testing to show that the
normal path is still working as expected.
The end result for the i/o error path is that the write operations still
happen, but the commit block is never written. This means that the end
result is essentially the same as a power outage at the point of
failure. The filesystem is then read-only until the user decides to
umount and correct the problem that caused the I/O error in the first place.
- -Jeff
- --
Jeff Mahoney
SuSE Labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBYuYfLPWxlyuTD7IRAt1OAJ9RgkYWrCKikftGephpWWGlS+acSQCgjDwm
cxcXvSVyldRsJZdagvatw0Y=
=DuY9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-05 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-05 15:08 Jeffrey Mahoney
2004-10-05 15:44 ` Hans Reiser
2004-10-05 17:22 ` Alex Zarochentsev
2004-10-05 17:40 ` Hans Reiser
2004-10-05 18:21 ` Jeff Mahoney [this message]
2004-10-05 18:40 ` Hans Reiser
2004-10-05 15:45 ` Hans Reiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4162E61F.5000103@novell.com \
--to=jeffm@novell.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=zam@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome