* why multiple definitions of SS_ONSTACK and SS_DISABLE
@ 2004-10-20 22:38 Chris Friesen
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Chris Friesen @ 2004-10-20 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux kernel
The following two definitions are identical for every architecture that defines
them. Is there any particular reason why they aren't defined in linux/signal.h
rather than asm/signal.h?
#define SS_ONSTACK 1
#define SS_DISABLE 2
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-10-20 22:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-10-20 22:38 why multiple definitions of SS_ONSTACK and SS_DISABLE Chris Friesen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome