Re: [PATCH 0/5] intel_pstate updates for v3.14-rcX

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>]

On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 03:53:48 PM Dirk Brandewie wrote:
> On 02/18/2014 02:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:29:54 PM Dirk Brandewie wrote:
> >> Hi Rafael,
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> On 02/12/2014 10:01 AM, dirk.brandewie@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com>
> >>>
> >>> Based on v3.14-rc2
> >>>
> >>> Patch 1 removes energy reporting the patch from Maurizio Lambardi
> >>>    intel_pstate: fix race condition in intel_pstate_init() can be dropped.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Any reason why patches 2-5 did not make rc3 other than timing?
> >>
> >> Patches 2/3 can easily wait for v3.15.x
> >>
> >> Patches 4/5 fix bugs that are in the wild.
> >
> > I asked you about them, but you didn't reply:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=139225158531023&w=4
> >
> > Again, do patches [4-5/5] depend on [2-3/5]?
> >
> > If not, I can queue them up for -rc4.
> 
> All the patches are independent of one another.
> 
> Patch 2 is straight cleanup no functional change but reduces the memory
> footprint slightly.
> 
> Patch 3 is a bug that will only be seen when the PID is reset at init time
> or when a change is made to PID params via debugfs.  The problem will only
> exist for one sample time since it is setting last_err in the PID.
> 
> Patch 4-5 are bugs found during Baytrail-T testing

Are there any pointers to bug reports that may be included in the changelogs
of these?

Rafael