Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] iommu/vt-d: Introduce interfaces for QI batching operations

[Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>]

On 2024/8/9 10:54, Tina Zhang wrote:
> Introduces qi_batch_xxx() interfaces to the VT-d driver to enhance the
> efficiency of IOTLB and Dev-IOTLB invalidation command processing.
> By allowing these commands to be batched together before submission,
> the patch aims to minimize the overhead previously incurred when
> handling these operations individually.
> 
> The addition of qi_batch_add_xxx() functions enable the accumulation of
> invalidation commands into a batch, while the qi_batch_flush_descs()
> function allows for the collective submission of these commands.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tina Zhang<tina.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c  | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 117 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> index 64724af1a618..8d55c49382fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> @@ -1636,6 +1636,84 @@ void qi_flush_iotlb(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did, u64 addr,
>   	qi_submit_sync(iommu, &desc, 1, 0);
>   }
>   
> +static void qi_batch_increment_index(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
> +					   struct qi_batch *batch)
> +{
> +	if (++batch->index == QI_MAX_BATCHED_DESC_COUNT)
> +		qi_batch_flush_descs(iommu, batch);
> +}
> +
> +void qi_batch_flush_descs(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct qi_batch *batch)
> +{
> +	if (!batch->index)
> +		return;
> +
> +	qi_submit_sync(iommu, batch->descs, batch->index, 0);
> +
> +	/* Reset the index value and clean the whole batch buffer */
> +	memset(batch, 0, sizeof(struct qi_batch));
> +}
> +
> +void qi_batch_add_iotlb_desc(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did, u64 addr,
> +			     unsigned int size_order, u64 type,
> +			     struct qi_batch *batch)
> +{
> +	qi_desc_iotlb(iommu, did, addr, size_order, type, &(batch->descs[batch->index]));
> +	qi_batch_increment_index(iommu, batch);
> +}
> +
> +void qi_batch_add_dev_iotlb_desc(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 sid,
> +				 u16 pfsid, u16 qdep, u64 addr,
> +				 unsigned int mask,
> +				 struct qi_batch *batch)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * According to VT-d spec, software is recommended to not submit any Device-TLB
> +	 * invalidation requests while address remapping hardware is disabled.
> +	 */
> +	if (!(iommu->gcmd & DMA_GCMD_TE))
> +		return;
> +
> +	qi_desc_dev_iotlb(sid, pfsid, qdep, addr, mask, &(batch->descs[batch->index]));
> +	qi_batch_increment_index(iommu, batch);
> +}
> +
> +void qi_batch_add_piotlb_desc(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did,
> +			      u32 pasid, u64 addr,
> +			      unsigned long npages, bool ih,
> +			      struct qi_batch *batch)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * npages == -1 means a PASID-selective invalidation, otherwise,
> +	 * a positive value for Page-selective-within-PASID invalidation.
> +	 * 0 is not a valid input.
> +	 */
> +	if (!npages)
> +		return;
> +
> +	qi_desc_piotlb(did, pasid, addr, npages, ih, &(batch->descs[batch->index]));
> +	qi_batch_increment_index(iommu, batch);
> +}
> +
> +void qi_batch_add_dev_iotlb_pasid_desc(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
> +				       u16 sid, u16 pfsid,
> +				       u32 pasid,  u16 qdep,
> +				       u64 addr, unsigned int size_order,
> +				       struct qi_batch *batch)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * According to VT-d spec, software is recommended to not submit any Device-TLB
> +	 * invalidation requests while address remapping hardware is disabled.
> +	 */
> +	if (!(iommu->gcmd & DMA_GCMD_TE))
> +		return;
> +
> +	qi_desc_dev_iotlb_pasid(sid, pfsid, pasid,
> +				qdep, addr, size_order,
> +				&(batch->descs[batch->index]));
> +	qi_batch_increment_index(iommu, batch);
> +}

How about moving all these helpers into drivers/iommu/intel/cache.c?
It's the only consumer for these helpers, right?

Thanks,
baolu