* [PATCH] srcu: Drop spurious WARN_ON() in cleanup_srcu_struct()
@ 2026-09-30 18:45 syzbot
2026-09-30 20:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2026-09-30 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: syzkaller-bugs, Bradley Morgan, Lai Jiangshan, Josh Triplett,
Paul E. McKenney, rcu, Onur Özkan, Zqiang
Cc: linux-kernel, mathieu.desnoyers, rostedt, syzbot
From: Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>
In cleanup_srcu_struct(), commit 78a38cbf6f20 ("srcu: Queue sdp->work when
the delay timer is successfully deleted") added logic to queue sdp->work if
timer_delete_sync(&sdp->delay_work) successfully canceled a pending timer
while callbacks remained pending on sdp->srcu_cblist. However, it wrapped
this check in a WARN_ON() under the assumption that callers invoking
srcu_barrier() prior to cleanup_srcu_struct() would prevent the warning
from triggering.
This warning can be spuriously triggered during valid teardown paths where
srcu_barrier() is properly invoked before cleanup_srcu_struct(), such as
when releasing blk-mq tag sets:
WARNING: kernel/rcu/srcutree.c:707 at cleanup_srcu_struct+0x3d6/0x8b0
kernel/rcu/srcutree.c:706
Call Trace:
<TASK>
blk_mq_free_tag_set+0x617/0x790 block/blk-mq.c:4976
scsi_mq_free_tags+0x16/0x30 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:2167
scsi_remove_host+0x243/0x730 drivers/scsi/hosts.c:193
uas_disconnect+0x135/0x3e0 drivers/usb/storage/uas.c:1236
usb_unbind_interface+0x295/0x9f0 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:461
device_release_driver_internal+0x4f5/0x880 drivers/base/dd.c:1372
bus_remove_device+0x444/0x560 drivers/base/bus.c:664
device_del+0x524/0x8f0 drivers/base/core.c:3965
usb_disconnect+0x346/0x9a0 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:2350
hub_event+0x1bbb/0x4d30 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5966
process_scheduled_works+0xc3d/0x1630 kernel/workqueue.c:3479
worker_thread+0xa47/0xfb0 kernel/workqueue.c:3560
kthread+0x38b/0x480 kernel/kthread.c:436
ret_from_fork+0x514/0xb70 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
</TASK>
This false positive occurs due to a race between callback invocation and
the teardown thread. First, sdp->delay_work can legitimately remain armed:
when an SRCU grace period completes, srcu_gp_end() arms sdp->delay_work
with a delay, and if callbacks are later scheduled with zero delay via
srcu_schedule_cbs_sdp(sdp, 0), queue_work_on() queues sdp->work directly
without deleting sdp->delay_work. Second, in srcu_invoke_callbacks(),
callbacks (including the one queued by srcu_barrier()) are extracted into a
local list and executed, but sdp->srcu_cblist length is only decremented
via rcu_segcblist_add_len(&sdp->srcu_cblist, -len) after all callbacks
finish executing. When srcu_barrier_cb() executes, it wakes the waiting
srcu_barrier() thread, which proceeds immediately to cleanup_srcu_struct().
At that point, the worker thread is still executing callbacks and has not
yet decremented the callback count, so timer_delete_sync(&sdp->delay_work)
returns 1 and rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&sdp->srcu_cblist) is non-zero, firing
the WARN_ON(). Immediately thereafter, flush_work(&sdp->work) waits for the
worker to finish, and the subsequent check on rcu_segcblist_n_cbs()
correctly sees no remaining callbacks.
Because WARN_ON() must not be used for conditions that can legitimately
happen, and pr_err() should be used instead if an actual error needs to be
reported (which is not applicable here as this is normal recovery
behavior), remove the WARN_ON() check and its accompanying comment. Keep
the queue_work_on() recovery logic so that flush_work() properly waits for
remaining callbacks to complete. Genuine callback leaks remain caught by
the subsequent authoritative
WARN_ON(rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&sdp->srcu_cblist)) check performed after work
has been flushed.
Fixes: 78a38cbf6f20 ("srcu: Queue sdp->work when the delay timer is successfully deleted")
Assisted-by: Gemini:gemini-3.8-flash Gemini:gemini-3.1-pro-preview syzbot
Reported-by: syzbot+02b37e31e64ea5cb6d29@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=02b37e31e64ea5cb6d29
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/ai_job?id=5a402d0b-b407-49a6-b0f3-b06197c1398f
Signed-off-by: Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>
---
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index ed204b3f4..7f30a5587 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -701,10 +701,8 @@ void cleanup_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct srcu_data *sdp = per_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda, cpu);
- // Call srcu_barrier() before this cleanup_srcu_struct()
- // to avoid triggering this WARN_ON().
- if (WARN_ON(timer_delete_sync(&sdp->delay_work) &&
- rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&sdp->srcu_cblist)) &&
+ if (timer_delete_sync(&sdp->delay_work) &&
+ rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&sdp->srcu_cblist) &&
rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(sdp->cpu))
queue_work_on(sdp->cpu, rcu_gp_wq, &sdp->work);
flush_work(&sdp->work);
base-commit: 72d3fcf802c45d00b300f25b848a93c3a2bd7c7e
--
See https://goo.gle/syzbot-ai-patches for information about AI-generated patches.
The person who has signed off on the patch is responsible for
addressing comments.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] srcu: Drop spurious WARN_ON() in cleanup_srcu_struct()
2026-09-30 18:45 [PATCH] srcu: Drop spurious WARN_ON() in cleanup_srcu_struct() syzbot
@ 2026-09-30 20:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-30 20:34 ` Bradley Morgan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2026-09-30 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: syzbot
Cc: syzkaller-bugs, Bradley Morgan, Lai Jiangshan, Josh Triplett,
rcu, Onur Özkan, Zqiang, linux-kernel, mathieu.desnoyers,
rostedt, syzbot, Sunho Park
Adding Sunho Park on CC for his fix:
b7e310c3e43e ("srcu: Fix WARN_ON() for rcu_segcblist_n_cbs() in cleanup_srcu_struct()")
On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 06:45:09PM +0000, syzbot wrote:
> From: Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>
>
> In cleanup_srcu_struct(), commit 78a38cbf6f20 ("srcu: Queue sdp->work when
> the delay timer is successfully deleted") added logic to queue sdp->work if
> timer_delete_sync(&sdp->delay_work) successfully canceled a pending timer
> while callbacks remained pending on sdp->srcu_cblist. However, it wrapped
> this check in a WARN_ON() under the assumption that callers invoking
> srcu_barrier() prior to cleanup_srcu_struct() would prevent the warning
> from triggering.
>
> This warning can be spuriously triggered during valid teardown paths where
> srcu_barrier() is properly invoked before cleanup_srcu_struct(), such as
> when releasing blk-mq tag sets:
>
> WARNING: kernel/rcu/srcutree.c:707 at cleanup_srcu_struct+0x3d6/0x8b0
> kernel/rcu/srcutree.c:706
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> blk_mq_free_tag_set+0x617/0x790 block/blk-mq.c:4976
> scsi_mq_free_tags+0x16/0x30 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:2167
> scsi_remove_host+0x243/0x730 drivers/scsi/hosts.c:193
> uas_disconnect+0x135/0x3e0 drivers/usb/storage/uas.c:1236
> usb_unbind_interface+0x295/0x9f0 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:461
> device_release_driver_internal+0x4f5/0x880 drivers/base/dd.c:1372
> bus_remove_device+0x444/0x560 drivers/base/bus.c:664
> device_del+0x524/0x8f0 drivers/base/core.c:3965
> usb_disconnect+0x346/0x9a0 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:2350
> hub_event+0x1bbb/0x4d30 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5966
> process_scheduled_works+0xc3d/0x1630 kernel/workqueue.c:3479
> worker_thread+0xa47/0xfb0 kernel/workqueue.c:3560
> kthread+0x38b/0x480 kernel/kthread.c:436
> ret_from_fork+0x514/0xb70 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
> </TASK>
>
> This false positive occurs due to a race between callback invocation and
> the teardown thread. First, sdp->delay_work can legitimately remain armed:
> when an SRCU grace period completes, srcu_gp_end() arms sdp->delay_work
> with a delay, and if callbacks are later scheduled with zero delay via
> srcu_schedule_cbs_sdp(sdp, 0), queue_work_on() queues sdp->work directly
> without deleting sdp->delay_work. Second, in srcu_invoke_callbacks(),
> callbacks (including the one queued by srcu_barrier()) are extracted into a
> local list and executed, but sdp->srcu_cblist length is only decremented
> via rcu_segcblist_add_len(&sdp->srcu_cblist, -len) after all callbacks
> finish executing. When srcu_barrier_cb() executes, it wakes the waiting
> srcu_barrier() thread, which proceeds immediately to cleanup_srcu_struct().
> At that point, the worker thread is still executing callbacks and has not
> yet decremented the callback count, so timer_delete_sync(&sdp->delay_work)
> returns 1 and rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&sdp->srcu_cblist) is non-zero, firing
> the WARN_ON(). Immediately thereafter, flush_work(&sdp->work) waits for the
> worker to finish, and the subsequent check on rcu_segcblist_n_cbs()
> correctly sees no remaining callbacks.
>
> Because WARN_ON() must not be used for conditions that can legitimately
> happen, and pr_err() should be used instead if an actual error needs to be
> reported (which is not applicable here as this is normal recovery
> behavior), remove the WARN_ON() check and its accompanying comment. Keep
> the queue_work_on() recovery logic so that flush_work() properly waits for
> remaining callbacks to complete. Genuine callback leaks remain caught by
> the subsequent authoritative
> WARN_ON(rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&sdp->srcu_cblist)) check performed after work
> has been flushed.
>
> Fixes: 78a38cbf6f20 ("srcu: Queue sdp->work when the delay timer is successfully deleted")
> Assisted-by: Gemini:gemini-3.8-flash Gemini:gemini-3.1-pro-preview syzbot
> Reported-by: syzbot+02b37e31e64ea5cb6d29@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=02b37e31e64ea5cb6d29
> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/ai_job?id=5a402d0b-b407-49a6-b0f3-b06197c1398f
> Signed-off-by: Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> index ed204b3f4..7f30a5587 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> @@ -701,10 +701,8 @@ void cleanup_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> struct srcu_data *sdp = per_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda, cpu);
>
> - // Call srcu_barrier() before this cleanup_srcu_struct()
> - // to avoid triggering this WARN_ON().
> - if (WARN_ON(timer_delete_sync(&sdp->delay_work) &&
> - rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&sdp->srcu_cblist)) &&
> + if (timer_delete_sync(&sdp->delay_work) &&
> + rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&sdp->srcu_cblist) &&
> rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(sdp->cpu))
> queue_work_on(sdp->cpu, rcu_gp_wq, &sdp->work);
> flush_work(&sdp->work);
>
>
> base-commit: 72d3fcf802c45d00b300f25b848a93c3a2bd7c7e
> --
> See https://goo.gle/syzbot-ai-patches for information about AI-generated patches.
> The person who has signed off on the patch is responsible for
> addressing comments.
> syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] srcu: Drop spurious WARN_ON() in cleanup_srcu_struct()
2026-09-30 20:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
@ 2026-09-30 20:34 ` Bradley Morgan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bradley Morgan @ 2026-09-30 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulmck, Paul E. McKenney, syzbot
Cc: syzkaller-bugs, Lai Jiangshan, Josh Triplett, rcu,
Onur Özkan, Zqiang, linux-kernel, mathieu.desnoyers,
rostedt, syzbot, Sunho Park
On 30 September 2026 21:29:51 BST, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
wrote:
>Adding Sunho Park on CC for his fix:
>
>b7e310c3e43e ("srcu: Fix WARN_ON() for rcu_segcblist_n_cbs() in
>cleanup_srcu_struct()")
Already done? Aw no
>
>On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 06:45:09PM +0000, syzbot wrote:
>> From: Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>
>>
>> In cleanup_srcu_struct(), commit 78a38cbf6f20 ("srcu: Queue sdp->work
>when
>> the delay timer is successfully deleted") added logic to queue sdp->work
>if
>> timer_delete_sync(&sdp->delay_work) successfully canceled a pending
>timer
>> while callbacks remained pending on sdp->srcu_cblist. However, it
>wrapped
>> this check in a WARN_ON() under the assumption that callers invoking
>> srcu_barrier() prior to cleanup_srcu_struct() would prevent the warning
>> from triggering.
>>
>> This warning can be spuriously triggered during valid teardown paths
>where
>> srcu_barrier() is properly invoked before cleanup_srcu_struct(), such as
>> when releasing blk-mq tag sets:
>>
>> WARNING: kernel/rcu/srcutree.c:707 at cleanup_srcu_struct+0x3d6/0x8b0
>> kernel/rcu/srcutree.c:706
>> Call Trace:
>> <TASK>
>> blk_mq_free_tag_set+0x617/0x790 block/blk-mq.c:4976
>> scsi_mq_free_tags+0x16/0x30 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:2167
>> scsi_remove_host+0x243/0x730 drivers/scsi/hosts.c:193
>> uas_disconnect+0x135/0x3e0 drivers/usb/storage/uas.c:1236
>> usb_unbind_interface+0x295/0x9f0 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:461
>> device_release_driver_internal+0x4f5/0x880 drivers/base/dd.c:1372
>> bus_remove_device+0x444/0x560 drivers/base/bus.c:664
>> device_del+0x524/0x8f0 drivers/base/core.c:3965
>> usb_disconnect+0x346/0x9a0 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:2350
>> hub_event+0x1bbb/0x4d30 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5966
>> process_scheduled_works+0xc3d/0x1630 kernel/workqueue.c:3479
>> worker_thread+0xa47/0xfb0 kernel/workqueue.c:3560
>> kthread+0x38b/0x480 kernel/kthread.c:436
>> ret_from_fork+0x514/0xb70 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
>> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
>> </TASK>
>>
>> This false positive occurs due to a race between callback invocation and
>> the teardown thread. First, sdp->delay_work can legitimately remain
>armed:
>> when an SRCU grace period completes, srcu_gp_end() arms sdp->delay_work
>> with a delay, and if callbacks are later scheduled with zero delay via
>> srcu_schedule_cbs_sdp(sdp, 0), queue_work_on() queues sdp->work directly
>> without deleting sdp->delay_work. Second, in srcu_invoke_callbacks(),
>> callbacks (including the one queued by srcu_barrier()) are extracted
>into a
>> local list and executed, but sdp->srcu_cblist length is only decremented
>> via rcu_segcblist_add_len(&sdp->srcu_cblist, -len) after all callbacks
>> finish executing. When srcu_barrier_cb() executes, it wakes the waiting
>> srcu_barrier() thread, which proceeds immediately to
>cleanup_srcu_struct().
>> At that point, the worker thread is still executing callbacks and has
>not
>> yet decremented the callback count, so
>timer_delete_sync(&sdp->delay_work)
>> returns 1 and rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&sdp->srcu_cblist) is non-zero, firing
>> the WARN_ON(). Immediately thereafter, flush_work(&sdp->work) waits for
>the
>> worker to finish, and the subsequent check on rcu_segcblist_n_cbs()
>> correctly sees no remaining callbacks.
>>
>> Because WARN_ON() must not be used for conditions that can legitimately
>> happen, and pr_err() should be used instead if an actual error needs to
>be
>> reported (which is not applicable here as this is normal recovery
>> behavior), remove the WARN_ON() check and its accompanying comment. Keep
>> the queue_work_on() recovery logic so that flush_work() properly waits
>for
>> remaining callbacks to complete. Genuine callback leaks remain caught by
>> the subsequent authoritative
>> WARN_ON(rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&sdp->srcu_cblist)) check performed after
>work
>> has been flushed.
>>
>> Fixes: 78a38cbf6f20 ("srcu: Queue sdp->work when the delay timer is
>successfully deleted")
>> Assisted-by: Gemini:gemini-3.8-flash Gemini:gemini-3.1-pro-preview
>syzbot
>> Reported-by: syzbot+02b37e31e64ea5cb6d29@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=02b37e31e64ea5cb6d29
>> Link:
>https://syzkaller.appspot.com/ai_job?id=5a402d0b-b407-49a6-b0f3-b06197c1398f
>> Signed-off-by: Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>
>>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
>> index ed204b3f4..7f30a5587 100644
>> --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
>> @@ -701,10 +701,8 @@ void cleanup_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
>> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> struct srcu_data *sdp = per_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda, cpu);
>>
>> - // Call srcu_barrier() before this cleanup_srcu_struct()
>> - // to avoid triggering this WARN_ON().
>> - if (WARN_ON(timer_delete_sync(&sdp->delay_work) &&
>> - rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&sdp->srcu_cblist)) &&
>> + if (timer_delete_sync(&sdp->delay_work) &&
>> + rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&sdp->srcu_cblist) &&
>> rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(sdp->cpu))
>> queue_work_on(sdp->cpu, rcu_gp_wq, &sdp->work);
>> flush_work(&sdp->work);
>>
>>
>> base-commit: 72d3fcf802c45d00b300f25b848a93c3a2bd7c7e
>> --
>> See https://goo.gle/syzbot-ai-patches for information about AI-generated
>patches.
>> The person who has signed off on the patch is responsible for
>> addressing comments.
>> syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
--- Thanks!
"I'm not a very positive person" - Linus torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-30 20:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-30 18:45 [PATCH] srcu: Drop spurious WARN_ON() in cleanup_srcu_struct() syzbot
2026-09-30 20:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-30 20:34 ` Bradley Morgan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®