From: Joe Damato <ice799@gmail.com>
To: linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org, linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Joe Damato <ice799@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 12/12] x86: Use struct fields instead of bitmasks
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:15:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <434766d4b5b6c08a3665c19038daaa3c1fa04cb0.1224903713.git.ice799@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0df5b7f8e2bee4a3599d6b80ea344b69d4bb4dc6.1224903713.git.ice799@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52f8491fb5d55c0171840b01638ea6db0a98f3be.1224903712.git.ice799@gmail.com>
Use fields in structs instead of bitmasks for getting/setting descriptor data.
Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <ice799@gmail.com>
---
drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c b/drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c
index bfb24d9..0d9c065 100644
--- a/drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c
+++ b/drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ void maybe_do_interrupt(struct lg_cpu *cpu)
* over them. */
idt = &cpu->arch.idt[FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR+irq];
/* If they don't have a handler (yet?), we just ignore it */
- if (idt_present(idt->a, idt->b)) {
+ if (idt->p) {
/* OK, mark it no longer pending and deliver it. */
clear_bit(irq, cpu->irqs_pending);
/* set_guest_interrupt() takes the interrupt descriptor and a
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ int deliver_trap(struct lg_cpu *cpu, unsigned int num)
/* Early on the Guest hasn't set the IDT entries (or maybe it put a
* bogus one in): if we fail here, the Guest will be killed. */
- if (!idt_present(cpu->arch.idt[num].a, cpu->arch.idt[num].b))
+ if (!cpu->arch.idt[num].p)
return 0;
set_guest_interrupt(cpu, desc_lo(cpu->arch.idt[num]),
desc_hi(cpu->arch.idt[num]), has_err(num));
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ void copy_traps(const struct lg_cpu *cpu, gate_desc *idt,
* If it can't go direct, we still need to copy the priv. level:
* they might want to give userspace access to a software
* interrupt. */
- if (idt_type(gidt->a, gidt->b) == 0xF)
+ if (gidt->type == 0xF)
idt[i] = *gidt;
else
default_idt_entry(&idt[i], i, def[i], gidt);
--
1.5.4.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-25 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-25 3:15 [PATCH 00/12] x86: Cleanup idt, gdt/ldt/tss structs Joe Damato
2008-10-25 3:15 ` [PATCH 01/12] x86: Cleanup x86 descriptors, remove a/b fields from structs Joe Damato
2008-10-25 3:15 ` [PATCH 02/12] x86: Use new gate_struct for gate_desc Joe Damato
2008-10-25 3:15 ` [PATCH 03/12] x86: Cleanup usage of struct desc_struct Joe Damato
2008-10-25 3:15 ` [PATCH 04/12] x86: Add macros for gate_desc Joe Damato
2008-10-25 3:15 ` [PATCH 05/12] x86: Refactor pack_gate " Joe Damato
2008-10-25 3:15 ` [PATCH 06/12] x86: Refactor pack_descriptor Joe Damato
2008-10-25 3:15 ` [PATCH 07/12] x86: Add a static initializer for IDTs Joe Damato
2008-10-25 3:15 ` [PATCH 08/12] x86: Use static intializer for IDT entries Joe Damato
2008-10-25 3:15 ` [PATCH 09/12] x86: Add static initiazlier for descriptors Joe Damato
2008-10-25 3:15 ` [PATCH 10/12] x86: Use static initializers " Joe Damato
2008-10-25 3:15 ` [PATCH 11/12] x86: Use macros for getting/setting descriptors Joe Damato
2008-10-25 3:15 ` Joe Damato [this message]
2008-10-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 12/12] x86: Use struct fields instead of bitmasks Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 09/12] x86: Add static initiazlier for descriptors Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-29 12:54 ` [PATCH 04/12] x86: Add macros for gate_desc Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-29 12:52 ` [PATCH 03/12] x86: Cleanup usage of struct desc_struct Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-29 12:53 ` [PATCH 02/12] x86: Use new gate_struct for gate_desc Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-25 5:40 ` [PATCH 00/12] x86: Cleanup idt, gdt/ldt/tss structs Willy Tarreau
2008-10-27 10:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-25 9:39 ` walter harms
2008-10-27 10:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-27 14:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-10-27 21:15 ` Joe Damato
2008-10-27 23:02 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=434766d4b5b6c08a3665c19038daaa3c1fa04cb0.1224903713.git.ice799@gmail.com \
--to=ice799@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®