From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Cc: helgaas@kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
rafael@kernel.org, hanjun.guo@linaro.org,
Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com, okaya@codeaurora.org,
jchandra@broadcom.com, robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com,
mw@semihalf.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, ddaney@caviumnetworks.com,
wangyijing@huawei.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com,
msalter@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org,
jcm@redhat.com, andrea.gallo@linaro.org, dhdang@apm.com,
jeremy.linton@arm.com, liudongdong3@huawei.com,
cov@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] pci, acpi: Match PCI config space accessors against platfrom specific ECAM quirks.
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 13:42:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4347711.qDrKz2s8lr@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464856864-18049-2-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com>
On Thursday, June 2, 2016 10:41:01 AM CEST Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> +struct pci_ecam_ops *pci_mcfg_get_ops(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
> +{
> + int bus_num = root->secondary.start;
> + int domain = root->segment;
> + struct pci_cfg_fixup *f;
> +
> + if (!mcfg_table)
> + return &pci_generic_ecam_ops;
> +
> + /*
> + * Match against platform specific quirks and return corresponding
> + * CAM ops.
> + *
> + * First match against PCI topology <domain:bus> then use OEM ID and
> + * OEM revision from MCFG table standard header.
> + */
> + for (f = __start_acpi_mcfg_fixups; f < __end_acpi_mcfg_fixups; f++) {
> + if ((f->domain == domain || f->domain == PCI_MCFG_DOMAIN_ANY) &&
> + (f->bus_num == bus_num || f->bus_num == PCI_MCFG_BUS_ANY) &&
> + (!strncmp(f->oem_id, mcfg_table->header.oem_id,
> + ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE)) &&
> + (f->oem_revision == mcfg_table->header.oem_revision))
> + return f->ops;
> + }
> + /* No quirks, use ECAM */
> + return &pci_generic_ecam_ops;
> +}
> +
> int pci_mcfg_lookup(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
Can you explain the use of pci_ecam_ops instead of pci_ops here?
I was hoping we'd be able to fold all of pci-ecam code into the
generic PCI layer at some point and get rid of pci_ecam_ops in the
process.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-02 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-02 8:41 [RFC PATCH 0/3] ECAM quirks handling for ARM64 platforms Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-02 8:41 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] pci, acpi: Match PCI config space accessors against platfrom specific ECAM quirks Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-02 11:42 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-06-02 12:07 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-02 12:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-02 13:35 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-02 15:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-14 9:06 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-03 15:15 ` Christopher Covington
2016-06-03 15:32 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-06-03 16:57 ` David Daney
2016-06-03 16:59 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2016-06-06 7:27 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-06-06 7:54 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-06-02 8:41 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] arm64, pci: Start using quirks handling for ACPI based PCI host controller Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-02 8:41 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] pci, pci-thunder-pem: Add ACPI support for ThunderX PEM Tomasz Nowicki
2016-07-19 21:17 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] ECAM quirks handling for ARM64 platforms Bjorn Helgaas
2016-07-20 5:05 ` Tomasz Nowicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4347711.qDrKz2s8lr@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=andrea.gallo@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=dhdang@apm.com \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jchandra@broadcom.com \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liudongdong3@huawei.com \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=mw@semihalf.com \
--cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=tn@semihalf.com \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®