From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ben.horgan@arm.com,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] arm64/mm: Add remaining TLBI_XXX_MASK macros
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:11:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <434eebff-069d-424f-a2b8-d9dae4e2202f@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251028124334.00001e77@huawei.com>
On 28/10/25 6:13 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 07:06:45 +0530
> Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> wrote:
>
>> On 24/10/25 4:30 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>> On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 05:02:07 +0100
>>> Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Add remaining TLBI_XXX_MASK macros and replace current open encoded fields.
>>>> While here replace hard coded page size based shifts but with derived ones
>>>> via ilog2() thus adding some required context.
>>>>
>>>> TLBI_TTL_MASK has been split into separate TLBI_TTL_MASK and TLBI_TG_MASK
>>>> as appropriate because currently it simultaneously contains both page size
>>>> and translation table level information. KVM on arm64 has been updated to
>>>> accommodate these changes to TLBI_TTL_MASK.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>>>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>>>> Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
>>>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>>>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>>> Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
>>>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
>>>> arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c | 8 +++++---
>>>> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
>>>> index 131096094f5b..cf75fc2a06c3 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
>>>> @@ -57,9 +57,10 @@
>>>> /* This macro creates a properly formatted VA operand for the TLBI */
>>>> #define __TLBI_VADDR(addr, asid) \
>>>> ({ \
>>>> - unsigned long __ta = (addr) >> 12; \
>>>> - __ta &= GENMASK_ULL(43, 0); \
>>>> - __ta |= (unsigned long)(asid) << 48; \
>>>> + unsigned long __ta = (addr) >> ilog2(SZ_4K); \
>>>> + __ta &= TLBI_BADDR_MASK; \
>>>> + __ta &= ~TLBI_ASID_MASK; \
>>>> + __ta |= FIELD_PREP(TLBI_ASID_MASK, asid); \
>>> I think you can replace the two lines above with
>>> FIELD_MODIFY(TLBI_ASID_MASK, &__ta, asid);
>>>
>>> It's a small reduction in code but I don't mind much either way.
>>
>> Right. FIELD_MODIFY() might be appropriate in this scenario but
>> there will be some additional code churn needed. I don't have a
>> strong opinion either way.
>>
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
>> @@ -55,13 +55,12 @@
>> } while (0)
>>
>> /* This macro creates a properly formatted VA operand for the TLBI */
>> -#define __TLBI_VADDR(addr, asid) \
>> - ({ \
>> - unsigned long __ta = (addr) >> ilog2(SZ_4K); \
>> - __ta &= TLBI_BADDR_MASK; \
>> - __ta &= ~TLBI_ASID_MASK; \
>> - __ta |= FIELD_PREP(TLBI_ASID_MASK, asid); \
>> - __ta; \
>> +#define __TLBI_VADDR(addr, asid) \
>> + ({ \
>> + unsigned long __ta = (addr) >> ilog2(SZ_4K); \
>> + __ta &= TLBI_BADDR_MASK; \
>> + __ta |= FIELD_MODIFY(TLBI_ASID_MASK, &__ta, asid); \
> FIELD_MODIFY(TLBI_ASID_MASK, &__tab, asid);
>
> as it's done in place in the second parameter.
Sorry but could not understand your point above.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-30 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-24 4:02 [PATCH V2 0/2] " Anshuman Khandual
2025-10-24 4:02 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] arm64/mm: Drop redundant 'level' range trimming in __tlbi_level() Anshuman Khandual
2025-10-24 4:02 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] arm64/mm: Add remaining TLBI_XXX_MASK macros Anshuman Khandual
2025-10-24 8:56 ` Ben Horgan
2025-10-27 1:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-10-24 11:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-27 1:36 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-10-28 12:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-30 2:41 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2025-11-13 9:15 ` [PATCH V2 0/2] " Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=434eebff-069d-424f-a2b8-d9dae4e2202f@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®