From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] arm64/mm: Add remaining TLBI_XXX_MASK macros
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 09:56:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <95ee2490-6904-4a24-93db-411c489bd2b4@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251024040207.137480-3-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Hi Anshuman,
On 10/24/25 05:02, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Add remaining TLBI_XXX_MASK macros and replace current open encoded fields.
> While here replace hard coded page size based shifts but with derived ones
> via ilog2() thus adding some required context.
>
> TLBI_TTL_MASK has been split into separate TLBI_TTL_MASK and TLBI_TG_MASK
> as appropriate because currently it simultaneously contains both page size
> and translation table level information. KVM on arm64 has been updated to
> accommodate these changes to TLBI_TTL_MASK.
>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
> arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c | 8 +++++---
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
The code looks correct to me, no functional changes. I however, don't
have any experience with this code and so don't know whether the split
of TTL into TG and TTL is a good idea or not and if the kvm naming is
best to stay the same or be updated to match this.
Thanks,
Ben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-24 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-24 4:02 [PATCH V2 0/2] " Anshuman Khandual
2025-10-24 4:02 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] arm64/mm: Drop redundant 'level' range trimming in __tlbi_level() Anshuman Khandual
2025-10-24 4:02 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] arm64/mm: Add remaining TLBI_XXX_MASK macros Anshuman Khandual
2025-10-24 8:56 ` Ben Horgan [this message]
2025-10-27 1:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-10-24 11:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-27 1:36 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-10-28 12:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-30 2:41 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-11-13 9:15 ` [PATCH V2 0/2] " Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=95ee2490-6904-4a24-93db-411c489bd2b4@arm.com \
--to=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®