mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RE: [PATCH 1/2] sched: Fix the irqtime code to deal with u64 wraps
@ 2010-12-15  1:07 Daniel Kopko
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Kopko @ 2010-12-15  1:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: dk_fedorabugs


Sorry for the lack of quoted text and lack of In-Reply-To headers.  (I am 
replying from a webmail account in reference to the following message:  
http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=129224292425624&w=2 ).  It seems that 
perhaps an unintentional omission of inline happened in this patch set, when 
converting update_rq_clock to static linkage.

 
-inline void update_rq_clock(struct rq *rq)
+static void update_rq_clock(struct rq *rq)


The rest of the functions which had static linkage added retained
the inline modifier.

This is my first message to LKML.  Can anyone recommend a decent free
email provider that will work well here?  Also, please CC me directly if 
convenient
for any replies.

Thanks,

Daniel Kopko


      

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: Fix the irqtime code to deal with u64 wraps
  2010-12-15 18:16     ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
@ 2010-12-15 18:24       ` Peter Zijlstra
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2010-12-15 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Venkatesh Pallipadi
  Cc: Eric Dumazet, Russell King - ARM Linux, Mikael Pettersson,
	Ingo Molnar, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, John Stultz,
	Christoph Lameter

On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 10:16 -0800, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote:
> Peter,
> 
> This looks like something that happened while splitting this into two
> patches. I needed a trivial change like below before I could apply
> these two patches on linus-git.
> 
> Thanks,
> Venki
> ---
> @@ -641,17 +641,18 @@ static void sched_irq_time_avg_update(struct rq
> *rq, u64 irq_time);
> 
>  inline void update_rq_clock(struct rq *rq)
>  {
> -	if (!rq->skip_clock_update) {
> -		int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
> -		u64 irq_time;
> +	int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
> +	u64 irq_time;
> 
> -		rq->clock = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
> -		irq_time = irq_time_cpu(cpu);
> -		if (rq->clock - irq_time > rq->clock_task)
> -			rq->clock_task = rq->clock - irq_time;
> +	if (rq->skip_clock_update)
> +		return;
> 
> -		sched_irq_time_avg_update(rq, irq_time);
> -	}
> +	rq->clock = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
> +	irq_time = irq_time_cpu(cpu);
> +	if (rq->clock - irq_time > rq->clock_task)
> +		rq->clock_task = rq->clock - irq_time;
> +
> +	sched_irq_time_avg_update(rq, irq_time);
>  }
> 
>  /*


That's due another patch in tip/sched/urgent



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: Fix the irqtime code to deal with u64 wraps
  2010-12-13 12:13   ` [PATCH 1/2] " Peter Zijlstra
@ 2010-12-15 18:16     ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
  2010-12-15 18:24       ` Peter Zijlstra
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Venkatesh Pallipadi @ 2010-12-15 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra
  Cc: Eric Dumazet, Russell King - ARM Linux, Mikael Pettersson,
	Ingo Molnar, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, John Stultz,
	Christoph Lameter

Peter,

This looks like something that happened while splitting this into two
patches. I needed a trivial change like below before I could apply
these two patches on linus-git.

Thanks,
Venki
---
@@ -641,17 +641,18 @@ static void sched_irq_time_avg_update(struct rq
*rq, u64 irq_time);

 inline void update_rq_clock(struct rq *rq)
 {
-	if (!rq->skip_clock_update) {
-		int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
-		u64 irq_time;
+	int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
+	u64 irq_time;

-		rq->clock = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
-		irq_time = irq_time_cpu(cpu);
-		if (rq->clock - irq_time > rq->clock_task)
-			rq->clock_task = rq->clock - irq_time;
+	if (rq->skip_clock_update)
+		return;

-		sched_irq_time_avg_update(rq, irq_time);
-	}
+	rq->clock = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
+	irq_time = irq_time_cpu(cpu);
+	if (rq->clock - irq_time > rq->clock_task)
+		rq->clock_task = rq->clock - irq_time;
+
+	sched_irq_time_avg_update(rq, irq_time);
 }

 /*

---

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> Subject: sched: Fix the irqtime code to deal with u64 wraps
> From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> Date: Thu Dec 09 14:15:34 CET 2010
>
> Some ARM systems have a short sched_clock() [ which needs to be fixed
> too ], but this exposed a bug in the irq_time code as well, it doesn't
> deal with wraps at all.
>
> Fix the irq_time code to deal with u64 wraps by re-writing the code to
> only use delta increments, which avoids the whole issue.
>
> Reviewed-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
> Reported-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
> Tested-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
> ---
>  kernel/sched.c |   83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -636,23 +636,18 @@ static inline struct task_group *task_gr
>
>  #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED */
>
> -static u64 irq_time_cpu(int cpu);
> -static void sched_irq_time_avg_update(struct rq *rq, u64 irq_time);
> +static void update_rq_clock_task(struct rq *rq, s64 delta);
>
> -inline void update_rq_clock(struct rq *rq)
> +static void update_rq_clock(struct rq *rq)
>  {
> -       int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
> -       u64 irq_time;
> +       s64 delta;
>
>        if (rq->skip_clock_update)
>                return;
>
> -       rq->clock = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
> -       irq_time = irq_time_cpu(cpu);
> -       if (rq->clock - irq_time > rq->clock_task)
> -               rq->clock_task = rq->clock - irq_time;
> -
> -       sched_irq_time_avg_update(rq, irq_time);
> +       delta = sched_clock_cpu(cpu_of(rq)) - rq->clock;
> +       rq->clock += delta;
> +       update_rq_clock_task(rq, delta);
>  }
>
>  /*
> @@ -1946,19 +1941,20 @@ void disable_sched_clock_irqtime(void)
>        sched_clock_irqtime = 0;
>  }
>
> -static u64 irq_time_cpu(int cpu)
> +static inline u64 irq_time_cpu(int cpu)
>  {
> -       if (!sched_clock_irqtime)
> -               return 0;
> -
>        return per_cpu(cpu_softirq_time, cpu) + per_cpu(cpu_hardirq_time, cpu);
>  }
>
> +/*
> + * Called before incrementing preempt_count on {soft,}irq_enter
> + * and before decrementing preempt_count on {soft,}irq_exit.
> + */
>  void account_system_vtime(struct task_struct *curr)
>  {
>        unsigned long flags;
> +       s64 delta;
>        int cpu;
> -       u64 now, delta;
>
>        if (!sched_clock_irqtime)
>                return;
> @@ -1966,9 +1962,9 @@ void account_system_vtime(struct task_st
>        local_irq_save(flags);
>
>        cpu = smp_processor_id();
> -       now = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
> -       delta = now - per_cpu(irq_start_time, cpu);
> -       per_cpu(irq_start_time, cpu) = now;
> +       delta = sched_clock_cpu(cpu) - __this_cpu_read(irq_start_time);
> +       __this_cpu_add(irq_start_time, delta);
> +
>        /*
>         * We do not account for softirq time from ksoftirqd here.
>         * We want to continue accounting softirq time to ksoftirqd thread
> @@ -1976,33 +1972,54 @@ void account_system_vtime(struct task_st
>         * that do not consume any time, but still wants to run.
>         */
>        if (hardirq_count())
> -               per_cpu(cpu_hardirq_time, cpu) += delta;
> +               __this_cpu_add(cpu_hardirq_time, delta);
>        else if (in_serving_softirq() && !(curr->flags & PF_KSOFTIRQD))
> -               per_cpu(cpu_softirq_time, cpu) += delta;
> +               __this_cpu_add(cpu_softirq_time, delta);
>
>        local_irq_restore(flags);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(account_system_vtime);
>
> -static void sched_irq_time_avg_update(struct rq *rq, u64 curr_irq_time)
> +static void update_rq_clock_task(struct rq *rq, s64 delta)
>  {
> -       if (sched_clock_irqtime && sched_feat(NONIRQ_POWER)) {
> -               u64 delta_irq = curr_irq_time - rq->prev_irq_time;
> -               rq->prev_irq_time = curr_irq_time;
> -               sched_rt_avg_update(rq, delta_irq);
> -       }
> +       s64 irq_delta;
> +
> +       irq_delta = irq_time_cpu(cpu_of(rq)) - rq->prev_irq_time;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Since irq_time is only updated on {soft,}irq_exit, we might run into
> +        * this case when a previous update_rq_clock() happened inside a
> +        * {soft,}irq region.
> +        *
> +        * When this happens, we stop ->clock_task and only update the
> +        * prev_irq_time stamp to account for the part that fit, so that a next
> +        * update will consume the rest. This ensures ->clock_task is
> +        * monotonic.
> +        *
> +        * It does however cause some slight miss-attribution of {soft,}irq
> +        * time, a more accurate solution would be to update the irq_time using
> +        * the current rq->clock timestamp, except that would require using
> +        * atomic ops.
> +        */
> +       if (irq_delta > delta)
> +               irq_delta = delta;
> +
> +       rq->prev_irq_time += irq_delta;
> +       delta -= irq_delta;
> +       rq->clock_task += delta;
> +
> +       if (irq_delta && sched_feat(NONIRQ_POWER))
> +               sched_rt_avg_update(rq, irq_delta);
>  }
>
> -#else
> +#else /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
>
> -static u64 irq_time_cpu(int cpu)
> +static void update_rq_clock_task(struct rq *rq, s64 delta)
>  {
> -       return 0;
> +       rq->clock_task += delta;
>  }
>
> -static void sched_irq_time_avg_update(struct rq *rq, u64 curr_irq_time) { }
> -
> -#endif
> +#endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
>
>  #include "sched_idletask.c"
>  #include "sched_fair.c"
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/2] sched: Fix the irqtime code to deal with u64 wraps
  2010-12-10 22:09 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
@ 2010-12-13 12:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
  2010-12-15 18:16     ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2010-12-13 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Venkatesh Pallipadi
  Cc: Eric Dumazet, Russell King - ARM Linux, Mikael Pettersson,
	Ingo Molnar, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, John Stultz,
	Christoph Lameter

Subject: sched: Fix the irqtime code to deal with u64 wraps
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Thu Dec 09 14:15:34 CET 2010

Some ARM systems have a short sched_clock() [ which needs to be fixed
too ], but this exposed a bug in the irq_time code as well, it doesn't
deal with wraps at all.

Fix the irq_time code to deal with u64 wraps by re-writing the code to
only use delta increments, which avoids the whole issue.

Reviewed-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Reported-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Tested-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
---
 kernel/sched.c |   83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -636,23 +636,18 @@ static inline struct task_group *task_gr
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED */
 
-static u64 irq_time_cpu(int cpu);
-static void sched_irq_time_avg_update(struct rq *rq, u64 irq_time);
+static void update_rq_clock_task(struct rq *rq, s64 delta);
 
-inline void update_rq_clock(struct rq *rq)
+static void update_rq_clock(struct rq *rq)
 {
-	int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
-	u64 irq_time;
+	s64 delta;
 
 	if (rq->skip_clock_update)
 		return;
 
-	rq->clock = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
-	irq_time = irq_time_cpu(cpu);
-	if (rq->clock - irq_time > rq->clock_task)
-		rq->clock_task = rq->clock - irq_time;
-
-	sched_irq_time_avg_update(rq, irq_time);
+	delta = sched_clock_cpu(cpu_of(rq)) - rq->clock;
+	rq->clock += delta;
+	update_rq_clock_task(rq, delta);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1946,19 +1941,20 @@ void disable_sched_clock_irqtime(void)
 	sched_clock_irqtime = 0;
 }
 
-static u64 irq_time_cpu(int cpu)
+static inline u64 irq_time_cpu(int cpu)
 {
-	if (!sched_clock_irqtime)
-		return 0;
-
 	return per_cpu(cpu_softirq_time, cpu) + per_cpu(cpu_hardirq_time, cpu);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Called before incrementing preempt_count on {soft,}irq_enter
+ * and before decrementing preempt_count on {soft,}irq_exit.
+ */
 void account_system_vtime(struct task_struct *curr)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
+	s64 delta;
 	int cpu;
-	u64 now, delta;
 
 	if (!sched_clock_irqtime)
 		return;
@@ -1966,9 +1962,9 @@ void account_system_vtime(struct task_st
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 
 	cpu = smp_processor_id();
-	now = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
-	delta = now - per_cpu(irq_start_time, cpu);
-	per_cpu(irq_start_time, cpu) = now;
+	delta = sched_clock_cpu(cpu) - __this_cpu_read(irq_start_time);
+	__this_cpu_add(irq_start_time, delta);
+
 	/*
 	 * We do not account for softirq time from ksoftirqd here.
 	 * We want to continue accounting softirq time to ksoftirqd thread
@@ -1976,33 +1972,54 @@ void account_system_vtime(struct task_st
 	 * that do not consume any time, but still wants to run.
 	 */
 	if (hardirq_count())
-		per_cpu(cpu_hardirq_time, cpu) += delta;
+		__this_cpu_add(cpu_hardirq_time, delta);
 	else if (in_serving_softirq() && !(curr->flags & PF_KSOFTIRQD))
-		per_cpu(cpu_softirq_time, cpu) += delta;
+		__this_cpu_add(cpu_softirq_time, delta);
 
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(account_system_vtime);
 
-static void sched_irq_time_avg_update(struct rq *rq, u64 curr_irq_time)
+static void update_rq_clock_task(struct rq *rq, s64 delta)
 {
-	if (sched_clock_irqtime && sched_feat(NONIRQ_POWER)) {
-		u64 delta_irq = curr_irq_time - rq->prev_irq_time;
-		rq->prev_irq_time = curr_irq_time;
-		sched_rt_avg_update(rq, delta_irq);
-	}
+	s64 irq_delta;
+
+	irq_delta = irq_time_cpu(cpu_of(rq)) - rq->prev_irq_time;
+
+	/*
+	 * Since irq_time is only updated on {soft,}irq_exit, we might run into
+	 * this case when a previous update_rq_clock() happened inside a
+	 * {soft,}irq region.
+	 *
+	 * When this happens, we stop ->clock_task and only update the
+	 * prev_irq_time stamp to account for the part that fit, so that a next
+	 * update will consume the rest. This ensures ->clock_task is
+	 * monotonic.
+	 *
+	 * It does however cause some slight miss-attribution of {soft,}irq
+	 * time, a more accurate solution would be to update the irq_time using
+	 * the current rq->clock timestamp, except that would require using
+	 * atomic ops.
+	 */
+	if (irq_delta > delta)
+		irq_delta = delta;
+
+	rq->prev_irq_time += irq_delta;
+	delta -= irq_delta;
+	rq->clock_task += delta;
+
+	if (irq_delta && sched_feat(NONIRQ_POWER))
+		sched_rt_avg_update(rq, irq_delta);
 }
 
-#else
+#else /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
 
-static u64 irq_time_cpu(int cpu)
+static void update_rq_clock_task(struct rq *rq, s64 delta)
 {
-	return 0;
+	rq->clock_task += delta;
 }
 
-static void sched_irq_time_avg_update(struct rq *rq, u64 curr_irq_time) { }
-
-#endif
+#endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
 
 #include "sched_idletask.c"
 #include "sched_fair.c"


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-12-15 18:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-12-15  1:07 [PATCH 1/2] sched: Fix the irqtime code to deal with u64 wraps Daniel Kopko
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-10 20:38 [PATCH] " Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 22:09 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-13 12:13   ` [PATCH 1/2] " Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-15 18:16     ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-15 18:24       ` Peter Zijlstra

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®