From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Martin Bligh <mbligh@mbligh.org>,
Pratap Subrahmanyam <pratap@vmware.com>,
Christopher Li <chrisl@vmware.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/21] i386 Broken bios common
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:16:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4370C141.6010508@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0511080703530.3247@g5.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Zachary Amsden wrote:
>
>>Both the APM BIOS and PnP BIOS code use a segment hack to simulate real
>>mode selector 0x40 (which points to the BIOS data area at 0x00400 in
>>real mode). Several broken BIOSen use selector 0x40 as if they were
>>running in real mode, which we make work by faking up selector 0x40 in
>>the GDT to point to physical memory starting at 0x400. We limit the
>>access to the remainder of this physical page using a byte granular
>>limit. Rather than have this tricky code in multiple places, it makes
>>sense to define it in one place, and the GDT makes a very convenient
>>place for it. Use GDT entry 4 as the BAD_BIOS_CACHE segment.
>
> I'd much rather use entry 8 instead, which should just automatically mean
> that selector 0x40 _always_ points to virtual address 0x400. No switching
> etc..
>
> Isn't this what Wine already has to work around, or something?
>
> Ingo, can we move the TLS selectors upwards, or does user space perhaps
> know about the current TLS layout? Wine in particular may well know ;(
>
I thought the point was that Wine needs to point GDT entry 8 into userspace.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-08 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-08 4:22 Zachary Amsden
2005-11-08 7:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-08 12:48 ` Zachary Amsden
2005-11-08 12:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-08 15:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-08 15:16 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2005-11-08 21:07 ` Zachary Amsden
2005-11-08 21:52 ` Zachary Amsden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4370C141.6010508@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=chrisl@vmware.com \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@mbligh.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pratap@vmware.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome