From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] i386: adjust page fault handling
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:57:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4370E6EF.76F0.0078.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4370AEE1.76F0.0078.0@novell.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 173 bytes --]
Adjust page fault protection error check before considering it to be
a vmalloc synchronization candidate.
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
(actual patch attached)
[-- Attachment #2: linux-2.6.14-i386-pagefault.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1182 bytes --]
Adjust page fault protection error check before considering it to be
a vmalloc synchronization candidate.
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
--- 2.6.14/arch/i386/mm/fault.c 2005-10-28 02:02:08.000000000 +0200
+++ 2.6.14-i386-pagefault/arch/i386/mm/fault.c 2005-11-04 16:19:33.000000000 +0100
@@ -223,6 +223,8 @@ fastcall void do_invalid_op(struct pt_re
* bit 0 == 0 means no page found, 1 means protection fault
* bit 1 == 0 means read, 1 means write
* bit 2 == 0 means kernel, 1 means user-mode
+ * bit 3 == 1 means use of reserved bit detected
+ * bit 4 == 1 means fault was an instruction fetch
*/
fastcall void __kprobes do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
unsigned long error_code)
@@ -259,10 +261,10 @@ fastcall void __kprobes do_page_fault(st
*
* This verifies that the fault happens in kernel space
* (error_code & 4) == 0, and that the fault was not a
- * protection error (error_code & 1) == 0.
+ * protection error (error_code & 9) == 0.
*/
if (unlikely(address >= TASK_SIZE)) {
- if (!(error_code & 5))
+ if (!(error_code & 0xd))
goto vmalloc_fault;
/*
* Don't take the mm semaphore here. If we fixup a prefetch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-08 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-08 12:57 [PATCH] i386: export genapic again Jan Beulich
2005-11-08 13:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-08 13:22 ` Jan Beulich
2005-11-08 13:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-08 14:17 ` Jan Beulich
2005-11-08 16:52 ` [PATCH] i386: make trap information available to die handlers Jan Beulich
2005-11-08 16:59 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-11-08 17:08 ` Jan Beulich
2005-11-08 17:13 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-11-09 8:20 ` Jan Beulich
2005-11-10 12:21 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-08 20:58 ` Richard Knutsson
2005-11-08 16:52 ` [PATCH] i386: int3 adjustment Jan Beulich
2005-11-09 8:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] i386: double fault adjustment - introduce THREAD_ORDER Jan Beulich
2005-11-09 8:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] i386: double fault adjustment Jan Beulich
2005-11-08 16:54 ` [PATCH] i386: NMI <-> debugging handler adjustments Jan Beulich
2005-11-08 16:55 ` [PATCH] i386: handle NMI case in IPI sending Jan Beulich
2005-11-08 16:55 ` [PATCH] i386: stand-alone CONFIG_PAE Jan Beulich
2005-11-08 17:02 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-08 17:10 ` Jan Beulich
2005-11-08 16:57 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2005-11-08 21:22 ` [PATCH] i386: export genapic again Randy.Dunlap
2005-11-09 8:18 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4370E6EF.76F0.0078.0@novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome