From: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:05:36 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43C991D0.3040808@bigpond.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43C9477B.8060709@google.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1142 bytes --]
Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>
>>
>> Attached is a new patch to fix the excessive idle problem. This patch
>> takes a new approach to the problem as it was becoming obvious that
>> trying to alter the load balancing code to cope with biased load was
>> harder than it seemed.
>>
>> This approach reverts to the old load values but weights them
>> according to tasks' bias_prio values. This means that any assumptions
>> by the load balancing code that the load generated by a single task is
>> SCHED_LOAD_SCALE will still hold. Then, in find_busiest_group(), the
>> imbalance is scaled back up to bias_prio scale so that move_tasks()
>> can move biased load rather than tasks.
>>
> OK, this one seems to fix the issue that I had, AFAICS. Congrats, and
> thanks,
Terrific, thanks for testing.
Con,
Attached is a cleaned up version of this patch against 2.6.15-mm4 with
some (hopefully helpful) comments added.
Signed-off-by: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.com.au>
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
[-- Attachment #2: different-approach-to-smp-nice-problem-v2 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4476 bytes --]
Index: MM-2.6.X/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- MM-2.6.X.orig/kernel/sched.c 2006-01-15 09:54:27.000000000 +1100
+++ MM-2.6.X/kernel/sched.c 2006-01-15 10:50:11.000000000 +1100
@@ -681,6 +681,13 @@ static int effective_prio(task_t *p)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+/*
+ * To aid in avoiding the subversion of "niceness" due to uneven distribution
+ * of tasks with abnormal "nice" values accross CPUs the contribution that
+ * each task makes to its run queue's load is weighted according to its
+ * scheduling class and "nice" value. The bias_prio field holds the value
+ * used to calculate the weight for each task.
+ */
static inline void set_bias_prio(task_t *p)
{
if (rt_task(p)) {
@@ -718,6 +725,18 @@ static inline void dec_nr_running(task_t
rq->nr_running--;
dec_prio_bias(rq, p);
}
+
+/* convert biased priority to scaled weighted load */
+static inline unsigned long weighted_load(unsigned long bias)
+{
+ return (bias * SCHED_LOAD_SCALE) / NICE_TO_BIAS_PRIO(0);
+}
+
+/* convert scaled weighted load to unscaled biased load */
+static inline unsigned long biased_load(unsigned long wload)
+{
+ return (wload * NICE_TO_BIAS_PRIO(0)) / SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
+}
#else
static inline void set_bias_prio(task_t *p)
{
@@ -1011,7 +1030,8 @@ void kick_process(task_t *p)
}
/*
- * Return a low guess at the load of a migration-source cpu.
+ * Return a low guess at the load of a migration-source cpu weighted
+ * according to the scheduling class and "nice" value.
*
* We want to under-estimate the load of migration sources, to
* balance conservatively.
@@ -1019,7 +1039,7 @@ void kick_process(task_t *p)
static unsigned long source_load(int cpu, int type)
{
runqueue_t *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
- unsigned long load_now = rq->prio_bias * SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
+ unsigned long load_now = weighted_load(rq->prio_bias);
if (type == 0)
return load_now;
@@ -1028,12 +1048,13 @@ static unsigned long source_load(int cpu
}
/*
- * Return a high guess at the load of a migration-target cpu
+ * Return a high guess at the load of a migration-target cpu weighted
+ * according to the scheduling class and "nice" value.
*/
static inline unsigned long target_load(int cpu, int type)
{
runqueue_t *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
- unsigned long load_now = rq->prio_bias * SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
+ unsigned long load_now = weighted_load(rq->prio_bias);
if (type == 0)
return load_now;
@@ -1299,7 +1320,7 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(task_t *p, uns
* of the current CPU:
*/
if (sync)
- tl -= p->bias_prio * SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
+ tl -= weighted_load(p->bias_prio);
if ((tl <= load &&
tl + target_load(cpu, idx) <= SCHED_LOAD_SCALE) ||
@@ -1903,9 +1924,9 @@ int can_migrate_task(task_t *p, runqueue
}
/*
- * move_tasks tries to move up to max_nr_move tasks from busiest to this_rq,
- * as part of a balancing operation within "domain". Returns the number of
- * tasks moved.
+ * move_tasks tries to move up to max_nr_move tasks and max_bias_move biased
+ * load from busiest to this_rq, as part of a balancing operation within
+ * "domain". Returns the number of tasks moved.
*
* Called with both runqueues locked.
*/
@@ -2134,8 +2155,11 @@ find_busiest_group(struct sched_domain *
return busiest;
}
- /* Get rid of the scaling factor, rounding down as we divide */
- *imbalance = *imbalance / SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
+ /*
+ * Get rid of the scaling factor, rounding down as we divide and
+ * converting to biased load for use by move_tasks()
+ */
+ *imbalance = biased_load(*imbalance);
return busiest;
out_balanced:
@@ -2448,7 +2472,8 @@ static void rebalance_tick(int this_cpu,
struct sched_domain *sd;
int i;
- this_load = this_rq->prio_bias * SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
+ /* weight load according to scheduling class and "nice" value */
+ this_load = weighted_load(this_rq->prio_bias);
/* Update our load */
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
unsigned long new_load = this_load;
Index: MM-2.6.X/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- MM-2.6.X.orig/include/linux/sched.h 2006-01-15 09:54:27.000000000 +1100
+++ MM-2.6.X/include/linux/sched.h 2006-01-15 10:14:42.000000000 +1100
@@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ struct task_struct {
#endif
int prio, static_prio;
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- int bias_prio;
+ int bias_prio; /* load "weight" factor for load balancing purposes */
#endif
struct list_head run_list;
prio_array_t *array;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-15 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-11 1:14 Martin Bligh
2006-01-11 1:31 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-11 1:41 ` Martin Bligh
2006-01-11 1:48 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-11 1:49 ` Con Kolivas
2006-01-11 2:38 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-11 3:07 ` Con Kolivas
2006-01-11 3:12 ` Martin Bligh
2006-01-11 3:40 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-11 3:49 ` Con Kolivas
2006-01-11 4:33 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-11 5:14 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-11 6:21 ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-01-11 12:24 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-11 14:29 ` Con Kolivas
2006-01-11 22:05 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-12 0:54 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-12 1:18 ` Con Kolivas
2006-01-12 1:29 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-12 1:36 ` Con Kolivas
2006-01-12 2:23 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-12 2:26 ` Martin Bligh
2006-01-12 6:39 ` Con Kolivas
2006-01-23 19:28 ` Martin Bligh
2006-01-24 1:25 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-24 3:50 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-24 4:41 ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-01-24 6:22 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-24 6:42 ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-01-28 23:20 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-29 0:52 ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-01-12 2:27 ` Con Kolivas
2006-01-12 2:04 ` Martin Bligh
2006-01-12 6:35 ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-01-12 6:41 ` Con Kolivas
2006-01-12 6:54 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-12 18:39 ` Martin Bligh
2006-01-12 20:03 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-12 22:20 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-13 7:06 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-13 12:00 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-13 16:15 ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-01-13 16:26 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-01-13 17:54 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-01-13 20:41 ` Martin Bligh
2006-01-14 0:23 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-14 5:03 ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-14 5:40 ` Con Kolivas
2006-01-14 6:05 ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-14 5:53 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-14 6:13 ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-13 22:59 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-14 18:48 ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-01-15 0:05 ` Peter Williams [this message]
2006-01-15 2:04 ` Con Kolivas
2006-01-15 2:09 ` [PATCH] sched - remove unnecessary smpnice ifdefs Con Kolivas
2006-01-15 3:50 ` -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench Ingo Molnar
2006-01-12 1:25 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-11 1:52 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43C991D0.3040808@bigpond.net.au \
--to=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome