* lpj=x loops_per_jiffy option enhancements
@ 2009-11-11 1:01 Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-11-11 1:03 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2009-11-11 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
The lpj argument seems nice but it seems busted for SMP. I was
wondering since this is a common thing for some embedded devices can't
we just stuff the lpj somewhere after our first boot and remove this
as an option?
Where we store it ? I don't know... we managed to store an image for
suspend, seems we can find a place for lpj, no?
Luis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: lpj=x loops_per_jiffy option enhancements
2009-11-11 1:01 lpj=x loops_per_jiffy option enhancements Luis R. Rodriguez
@ 2009-11-11 1:03 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2009-11-11 1:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@gmail.com> wrote:
> The lpj argument seems nice but it seems busted for SMP. I was
> wondering since this is a common thing for some embedded devices can't
> we just stuff the lpj somewhere after our first boot and remove this
> as an option?
>
> Where we store it ? I don't know... we managed to store an image for
> suspend, seems we can find a place for lpj, no?
And only do it for UP boxen, and *always* do it for them. Or is the
lpj expected to change over time on a box?
Luis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-11-11 1:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-11 1:01 lpj=x loops_per_jiffy option enhancements Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-11-11 1:03 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®