mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Piel <Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net>
To: Vadim Lobanov <vlobanov@speakeasy.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: limits / PIPE_BUF?
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 09:15:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4459AA1B.9020207@tremplin-utc.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0605032244230.25908@shell2.speakeasy.net>

05/04/2006 07:55 AM, Vadim Lobanov wrote/a écrit:
> Hi,
Hi!

:
> 
> A snippet from include/linux/limits.h:
> #define PIPE_BUF        4096    /* # bytes in atomic write to a pipe */
> 
> PIPE_BUF is a bit of an oddity. It is defined there, then redefined in
> the arm header files, even though those header files are never included
> anywhere.
Actually, here, on a 2.6.16 source code, PIPE_BUF is used in 
arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sunos.c, arch/sparc64/kernel/sys_sunos32.c, and 
arch/sparc64/solaris/fs.c . It seems it's some kind of compatibility 
value with Sun's OS...


> Also, PIPE_BUF is never referenced by name in any of the Linux
> code. And yet, it is still being mentioned in some Big And Scary
> Warnings (tm): fs/autofs4/waitq.c or include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h, for
> example.
Maybe they wanted to say PIPE_BUFFERS ? (just wild guess)

c u,
Eric

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-05-04  7:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-04  5:55 Vadim Lobanov
2006-05-04  6:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-05-04 16:39   ` Vadim Lobanov
2006-05-04 17:16     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-05-04 17:50       ` Vadim Lobanov
2006-05-04 17:54         ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-05-04 18:10           ` Vadim Lobanov
2006-05-04  7:15 ` Eric Piel [this message]
2006-05-04 16:42   ` Vadim Lobanov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4459AA1B.9020207@tremplin-utc.net \
    --to=eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vlobanov@speakeasy.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®