* Re: 6.12.50-rc1 review
2025-09-30 14:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-09-30 18:49 ` Brett A C Sheffield
2025-09-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 6.12 00/89] " Florian Fainelli
` (11 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Brett A C Sheffield @ 2025-09-30 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
Brett A C Sheffield
# Librecast Test Results
010/010 [ OK ] libmld
120/120 [ OK ] liblibrecast
CPU/kernel: Linux auntie 6.12.50-rc1-g8e6ad214c7b3 #92 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue Sep 30 15:25:02 -00 2025 x86_64 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
Tested-by: Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@librecast.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review
2025-09-30 14:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-30 18:49 ` Brett A C Sheffield
@ 2025-09-30 18:51 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-09-30 19:18 ` Guenter Roeck
` (10 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2025-09-30 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor,
hargar, broonie, achill
On 9/30/25 07:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.50 release.
> There are 89 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.50-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review
2025-09-30 14:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-30 18:49 ` Brett A C Sheffield
2025-09-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 6.12 00/89] " Florian Fainelli
@ 2025-09-30 19:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-10-02 7:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-30 20:18 ` Peter Schneider
` (9 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2025-09-30 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
On 9/30/25 07:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.50 release.
> There are 89 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
s390:allmodconfig:
parisc:allmodconfig:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c: In function 'scale':
././include/linux/compiler_types.h:536:45: error:
call to '__compiletime_assert_666' declared with attribute error: clamp() low limit source_min greater than high limit source_max
include/linux/compiler_types.h:517:25: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert'
517 | prefix ## suffix(); \
| ^~~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:536:9: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
536 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/minmax.h:188:9: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
188 | BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(statically_true(ulo > uhi), \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/minmax.h:195:9: note: in expansion of macro '__clamp_once'
195 | __clamp_once(type, val, lo, hi, __UNIQUE_ID(v_), __UNIQUE_ID(l_), __UNIQUE_ID(h_))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/minmax.h:206:28: note: in expansion of macro '__careful_clamp'
206 | #define clamp(val, lo, hi) __careful_clamp(__auto_type, val, lo, hi)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c:47:22: note: in expansion of macro 'clamp'
47 | source_val = clamp(source_val, source_min, source_max);
This is exposed by the minmax patch series, as with 6.12.49.
Fixed upstream with commit 6f7150741584 ("drm/i915/backlight: Return immediately
when scale() finds invalid parameters"). This patch also includes an explanation
of what exactly happens (and thanks again to Linus for the analysis).
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review
2025-09-30 19:18 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2025-10-02 7:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2025-10-02 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 12:18:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 9/30/25 07:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.50 release.
> > There are 89 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> s390:allmodconfig:
> parisc:allmodconfig:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c: In function 'scale':
> ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:536:45: error:
> call to '__compiletime_assert_666' declared with attribute error: clamp() low limit source_min greater than high limit source_max
> include/linux/compiler_types.h:517:25: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert'
> 517 | prefix ## suffix(); \
> | ^~~~~~
> include/linux/compiler_types.h:536:9: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
> 536 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
> 39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/minmax.h:188:9: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
> 188 | BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(statically_true(ulo > uhi), \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/minmax.h:195:9: note: in expansion of macro '__clamp_once'
> 195 | __clamp_once(type, val, lo, hi, __UNIQUE_ID(v_), __UNIQUE_ID(l_), __UNIQUE_ID(h_))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/minmax.h:206:28: note: in expansion of macro '__careful_clamp'
> 206 | #define clamp(val, lo, hi) __careful_clamp(__auto_type, val, lo, hi)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c:47:22: note: in expansion of macro 'clamp'
> 47 | source_val = clamp(source_val, source_min, source_max);
>
> This is exposed by the minmax patch series, as with 6.12.49.
>
> Fixed upstream with commit 6f7150741584 ("drm/i915/backlight: Return immediately
> when scale() finds invalid parameters"). This patch also includes an explanation
> of what exactly happens (and thanks again to Linus for the analysis).
Sorry about that, I missed this when you previously reported, my fault.
I'll go queue this up everywhere now.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review
2025-09-30 14:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-30 19:18 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2025-09-30 20:18 ` Peter Schneider
2025-10-01 2:51 ` Ron Economos
` (8 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Peter Schneider @ 2025-09-30 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
Am 30.09.2025 um 16:47 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.50 release.
> There are 89 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Builds, boots and works on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2 server. No dmesg oddities or regressions found.
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider
--
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you. -- David McCullough Jr.
OpenPGP: 0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review
2025-09-30 14:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-30 20:18 ` Peter Schneider
@ 2025-10-01 2:51 ` Ron Economos
2025-10-01 9:12 ` Jon Hunter
` (7 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2025-10-01 2:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
On 9/30/25 07:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.50 release.
> There are 89 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.50-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review
2025-09-30 14:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-01 2:51 ` Ron Economos
@ 2025-10-01 9:12 ` Jon Hunter
2025-10-01 10:14 ` Mark Brown
` (6 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-10-01 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
linux-tegra, stable
On Tue, 30 Sep 2025 16:47:14 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.50 release.
> There are 89 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.50-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.12:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
120 tests: 120 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.12.50-rc1-g8e6ad214c7b3
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review
2025-09-30 14:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-01 9:12 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2025-10-01 10:14 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-01 10:15 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (5 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-10-01 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, achill
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 04:47:14PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.50 release.
> There are 89 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review
2025-09-30 14:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-01 10:14 ` Mark Brown
@ 2025-10-01 10:15 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-10-01 13:30 ` Brett Mastbergen
` (4 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-10-01 10:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
On Tue, 30 Sept 2025 at 20:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.50 release.
> There are 89 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.50-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.12.50-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 8e6ad214c7b34b9022784193fdc71e1561cdf11b
* git describe: v6.12.49-90-g8e6ad214c7b3
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.12.y/build/v6.12.49-90-g8e6ad214c7b3
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.12.48-106-g1fcc11b6cbfd)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.12.48-106-g1fcc11b6cbfd)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.12.48-106-g1fcc11b6cbfd)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.12.48-106-g1fcc11b6cbfd)
## Test result summary
total: 325661, pass: 300251, fail: 7071, skip: 17840, xfail: 499
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 144 total, 142 passed, 2 failed
* arm64: 63 total, 62 passed, 1 failed
* i386: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 33 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 40 total, 39 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 22 total, 20 passed, 2 failed
* sh: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 4 total, 3 passed, 1 failed
* x86_64: 54 total, 51 passed, 3 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mm
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* lava
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* modules
* rcutorture
* rt-tests-cyclicdeadline
* rt-tests-pi-stress
* rt-tests-pmqtest
* rt-tests-rt-migrate-test
* rt-tests-signaltest
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review
2025-09-30 14:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-01 10:15 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-10-01 13:30 ` Brett Mastbergen
2025-10-01 16:05 ` Shuah Khan
` (3 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Brett Mastbergen @ 2025-10-01 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 11:27 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.50 release.
> There are 89 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.50-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Builds successfully. Boots and works on qemu and Dell XPS 15 9520 w/
Intel Core i7-12600H
Tested-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>
Thanks,
Brett
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review
2025-09-30 14:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-01 13:30 ` Brett Mastbergen
@ 2025-10-01 16:05 ` Shuah Khan
2025-10-01 17:40 ` Miguel Ojeda
` (2 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2025-10-01 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, Shuah Khan
On 9/30/25 08:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.50 release.
> There are 89 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.50-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review
2025-09-30 14:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-01 16:05 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2025-10-01 17:40 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-10-02 7:06 ` Pascal Ernster
2025-10-03 6:56 ` Pavel Machek
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Ojeda @ 2025-10-01 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: achill, akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, jonathanh,
linux-kernel, linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel,
rwarsow, shuah, stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds, Miguel Ojeda
On Tue, 30 Sep 2025 16:47:14 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.50 release.
> There are 89 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Boot-tested under QEMU for Rust x86_64, arm64 and riscv64; built-tested
for loongarch64:
Tested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review
2025-09-30 14:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-01 17:40 ` Miguel Ojeda
@ 2025-10-02 7:06 ` Pascal Ernster
2025-10-03 6:56 ` Pavel Machek
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Pascal Ernster @ 2025-10-02 7:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
[2025-09-30 16:47] Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.50 release.
> There are 89 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.50-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
Hi Greg,
I've applied all patches from the current version of stable-queue/queue-6.12 (commit id b249cb4d7eedc179382f657819c5ff4c55230b44) applied on top of kernel 6.12.49, compiled the result with GCC 15.2.0 and binutils 2.44 as part of OpenWRT images for various platforms, and booted and tested those images on the following platforms without noticing any issues:
- x86_64: Intel Haswell VM
- MIPS 4KEc V7.0: Netgear GS108T v3 (SoC: Realtek RTL8380M)
- MIPS 74Kc V5.0: TP-Link Archer C7 v4 (SoC: Qualcomm QCA956X)
Tested-by: Pascal Ernster <git@hardfalcon.net>
Regards
Pascal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review
2025-09-30 14:47 [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-02 7:06 ` Pascal Ernster
@ 2025-10-03 6:56 ` Pavel Machek
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2025-10-03 6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 642 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.50 release.
> There are 89 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.12.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
In cooperation with DENX Software Engineering GmbH, HRB 165235 Munich,
Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread