mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux time code
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:36:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44E3114C.1010808@flower.upol.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44E32B23.16949.BBB1EC4@Ulrich.Windl.rkdvmks1.ngate.uni-regensburg.de>

Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Hi everybody!
> 
> I've been viewing recent changes to the Linux kernel (specifically 2.6.15.1 to 
> 2.6.17.8), and I felt I'll have to say something:
> 
> First there's a new routine in kernel/time.c named "set_normalized_timespec()". 
[..something....]
> Sorry if you don't like that kind of message, but I just had to say that. It seems 
> the time subsystem is already so complex that people are just adding new code 
> instead of considering redesign or reuse of the existing code.
> 
As far as i can see here's "return -ENOPATCH;" kind of mail list.
Did you read and consider cooperation with authors of:

"We Are Not Getting Any Younger: A New Approach to  Time and Timers"
<http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2005/linuxsymposium_procv1.pdf>

"Hrtimers and Beyond: Transforming the Linux Time"
Subsystems <https://ols2006.108.redhat.com/reprints/gleixner-reprint.pdf>  ?

> Regards,
> Ulrich
> 

-- 
-o--=O`C
  #oo'L O
<___=E M


  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-16 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-16 12:26 Ulrich Windl
2006-08-16 12:36 ` Oleg Verych [this message]
2006-08-16 15:35   ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-16 15:12     ` Oleg Verych
2006-08-16 19:53 ` john stultz
2006-08-17  7:20   ` Ulrich Windl
2006-08-17 19:15     ` john stultz
2006-08-17 11:43   ` Roman Zippel
2006-08-17 21:58     ` john stultz
2006-08-17 22:11       ` Jesse Barnes
2006-08-17 22:32         ` john stultz
2006-08-17 22:50           ` Jesse Barnes
2006-08-17 23:02             ` john stultz
2006-08-20 17:14               ` Roman Zippel
2006-08-20 17:10       ` Roman Zippel
2006-08-23  6:25 linux
2006-08-23 18:29 ` john stultz
2006-08-24  2:35   ` linux
2006-08-28 11:39     ` Roman Zippel
2006-08-28 22:36       ` john stultz
2006-08-29  3:28         ` linux
2006-08-29 13:15           ` Theodore Tso
2006-08-29 15:18             ` linux
2006-08-29 19:23           ` john stultz
2006-08-29 14:43         ` Roman Zippel
2006-08-26  0:17   ` linux
2006-08-28 22:41     ` john stultz
2006-08-26  3:46   ` linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44E3114C.1010808@flower.upol.cz \
    --to=olecom@flower.upol.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®