mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/17] wlcore: Align reg_ch_conf_pending and tmp_ch_bitmap to unsigned long for better performance
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 11:46:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44bb6771-7aea-c44d-6605-45e7a1499d1b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190304101141.GB32477@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 04/03/19 11:11, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 06:44:57PM -0800, Fenghua Yu wrote:
>> A bit in reg_ch_conf_pending in wl271 and tmp_ch_bitmap is set 
>> atomically by set_bit(). set_bit() sets the bit in a single 
>> unsigned long location. If the variables are not aligned to 
>> unsigned long, set_bit() accesses two cache lines and thus causes 
>> slower performance. On x86, this scenario is called split lock and 
>> can cause overall performance degradation due to locked BTSL 
>> instruction in set_bit() locks bus.
>> 
>> To avoid performance degradation, the two variables are aligned to
>>  unsigned long.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> --- 
>> drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c    | 3 ++- 
>> drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h | 6 ++++-- 2 files
>> changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c 
>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c index 
>> 903968735a74..8d15a6307d44 100644 --- 
>> a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c +++ 
>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c @@ -1707,7 +1707,8 @@ int 
>> wlcore_cmd_regdomain_config_locked(struct wl1271 *wl) { struct 
>> wl12xx_cmd_regdomain_dfs_config *cmd = NULL; int ret = 0, i, b, 
>> ch_bit_idx; -	u32 tmp_ch_bitmap[2]; +	/* Align to unsigned long
>> for better performance in set_bit() */ +	u32 tmp_ch_bitmap[2] 
>> __aligned(sizeof(unsigned long));

This is the only place where an array of u32 is needed, because of

        cmd->ch_bit_map1 = cpu_to_le32(tmp_ch_bitmap[0]);
        cmd->ch_bit_map2 = cpu_to_le32(tmp_ch_bitmap[1]);

All the others should use DECLARE_BITMAP, including reg_ch_conf_last 
which was already using __aligned.  As Peter mentioned they should
also use set_bit_le.  Actually they do not need locked access at all
because the only code paths to the set_bit take a mutex.

There is one other place that is accessing the items of the array, but
it is fixed easily.  The following patch should do everything:

------------------- 8< --------------------------
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] wlcore: simplify/fix/optimize reg_ch_conf_pending operations

Bitmaps are defined on unsigned longs, so the usage of u32[2] in the
wlcore driver is incorrect.  As noted by Peter Zijlstra, casting arrays
to a bitmap is incorrect for big-endian architectures.

When looking at it I observed that:

- operations on reg_ch_conf_pending is always under the wl_lock mutex,
so set_bit is overkill

- the only case where reg_ch_conf_pending is accessed a u32 at a time is
unnecessary too.

This patch cleans up everything in this area, and changes tmp_ch_bitmap
to have the proper alignment.

Reported-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c
index 903968735a74..3e093f3a7ec8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/cmd.c
@@ -1700,14 +1700,14 @@ void wlcore_set_pending_regdomain_ch(struct wl1271 *wl, u16 channel,
 	ch_bit_idx = wlcore_get_reg_conf_ch_idx(band, channel);
 
 	if (ch_bit_idx >= 0 && ch_bit_idx <= WL1271_MAX_CHANNELS)
-		set_bit(ch_bit_idx, (long *)wl->reg_ch_conf_pending);
+		__set_bit_le(ch_bit_idx, (long *)wl->reg_ch_conf_pending);
 }
 
 int wlcore_cmd_regdomain_config_locked(struct wl1271 *wl)
 {
 	struct wl12xx_cmd_regdomain_dfs_config *cmd = NULL;
 	int ret = 0, i, b, ch_bit_idx;
-	u32 tmp_ch_bitmap[2];
+	u32 tmp_ch_bitmap[2] __aligned(sizeof(unsigned long));
 	struct wiphy *wiphy = wl->hw->wiphy;
 	struct ieee80211_supported_band *band;
 	bool timeout = false;
@@ -1717,7 +1717,7 @@ int wlcore_cmd_regdomain_config_locked(struct wl1271 *wl)
 
 	wl1271_debug(DEBUG_CMD, "cmd reg domain config");
 
-	memset(tmp_ch_bitmap, 0, sizeof(tmp_ch_bitmap));
+	memcpy(tmp_ch_bitmap, wl->reg_ch_conf_pending, sizeof(tmp_ch_bitmap));
 
 	for (b = NL80211_BAND_2GHZ; b <= NL80211_BAND_5GHZ; b++) {
 		band = wiphy->bands[b];
@@ -1738,13 +1738,10 @@ int wlcore_cmd_regdomain_config_locked(struct wl1271 *wl)
 			if (ch_bit_idx < 0)
 				continue;
 
-			set_bit(ch_bit_idx, (long *)tmp_ch_bitmap);
+			__set_bit_le(ch_bit_idx, (long *)tmp_ch_bitmap);
 		}
 	}
 
-	tmp_ch_bitmap[0] |= wl->reg_ch_conf_pending[0];
-	tmp_ch_bitmap[1] |= wl->reg_ch_conf_pending[1];
-
 	if (!memcmp(tmp_ch_bitmap, wl->reg_ch_conf_last, sizeof(tmp_ch_bitmap)))
 		goto out;
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h
index dd14850b0603..870eea3e7a27 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore.h
@@ -320,9 +320,9 @@ struct wl1271 {
 	bool watchdog_recovery;
 
 	/* Reg domain last configuration */
-	u32 reg_ch_conf_last[2]  __aligned(8);
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(reg_ch_conf_last, 64);
 	/* Reg domain pending configuration */
-	u32 reg_ch_conf_pending[2];
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(reg_ch_conf_pending, 64);
 
 	/* Pointer that holds DMA-friendly block for the mailbox */
 	void *mbox;

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-04 10:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-02  2:44 [PATCH v4 00/17] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split locked accesses Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02  2:44 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] x86/common: Align cpu_caps_cleared and cpu_caps_set to unsigned long Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04  8:33   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 10:17     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-04 10:48       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 12:44         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-04 13:13           ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-02  2:44 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] drivers/net/b44: Align pwol_mask to unsigned long for better performance Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 10:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-04 14:45     ` Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 15:27       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-02  2:44 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] wlcore: Align reg_ch_conf_pending and tmp_ch_bitmap " Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 10:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-04 10:46     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2019-03-04 12:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-04 13:09         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 13:30           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-04 14:40       ` Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 15:54         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-02  2:44 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] x86/split_lock: Align x86_capability to unsigned long to avoid split locked access Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 18:52   ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-04 19:15     ` Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 19:29       ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-04 20:08       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-04 20:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-02  2:44 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES MSR Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 18:53   ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-04 18:55     ` Yu, Fenghua
2019-03-04 19:01       ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] x86/msr-index: Define IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY MSR and #AC exception for split lock bit Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] x86/split_lock: Enumerate #AC for split lock by MSR IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 18:58   ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-04 18:59     ` Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 19:19       ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] x86/clearcpuid: Support multiple clearcpuid options Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] x86/clearcpuid: Support feature flag string in kernel option clearcpuid Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] x86/clearcpuid: Apply cleared feature bits that are forced set before Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] x86/clearcpuid: Clear CPUID bit in CPUID faulting Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04 22:04   ` kbuild test robot
2019-03-05  7:27   ` kbuild test robot
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] Change document for kernel option clearcpuid Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] x86/split_lock: Handle #AC exception for split lock Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] x86/split_lock: Add a sysfs interface to allow user to enable or disable split lock detection on all CPUs during run time Fenghua Yu
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] kvm: x86: Report CORE_CAPABILITY on GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04  8:38   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 10:47     ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-04 10:49       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 11:10         ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-04 11:14           ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 11:21             ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-05  7:03             ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] kvm: x86: Add support IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY MSR Fenghua Yu
2019-03-04  8:42   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-04 12:32     ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-08  6:10     ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-08  7:54       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-08  8:03         ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-02  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] kvm: vmx: Emulate TEST_CTL MSR Fenghua Yu
2019-03-09  2:31   ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-11 13:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-11 15:10       ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-11 15:21         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-03-11 16:58           ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-03-04 21:55 ` [PATCH v4 00/17] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split locked accesses Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-03-05  0:06   ` Fenghua Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44bb6771-7aea-c44d-6605-45e7a1499d1b@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®