From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: "Kristian Høgsberg" <krh@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Import fw-sbp2 driver.
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:40:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4581C4D1.8090803@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4581B88C.9040104@redhat.com>
Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> doesn't allowing the stack to issue REPORT LUNS take care of this?
>
> Possibly, I don't have firewire multi-LUN devices to test with here.
> The LUNs are also discoverable from the firewire config rom, which is
> why I put the comment there. This doesn't mean that the SCSI commands
> for discovering LUNs doesn't also work.
I expect REPORT LUNS won't work for many SBP-2 devices. It is not included
in RBC.
We discover LUs properly from the information in the ISO 13213 ROM. We just
don't map multiple LUs of the same target to scsi_device's beneath a single
scsi_target. (We instantiate one Scsi_Host for each LU. I might implement
a respective mapping some day, but there is no bigger benefit of doing so.)
>>> +static int sbp2_scsi_queuecommand(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd,
>>> scsi_done_fn_t done)
>>> +{
>>> + if (cmd->cmnd[0] == REQUEST_SENSE) {
>>> + fw_notify("request_sense");
>>> + memcpy(cmd->request_buffer, cmd->sense_buffer,
>>> cmd->request_bufflen);
>>> + memset(cmd->sense_buffer, 0, sizeof(cmd->sense_buffer));
>>> + cmd->result = DID_OK << 16;
>>> + done(cmd);
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>
>> this is a broken emulation. this command is specified to not
>> repeatedly return the same sense data.
>
> I copied it over from the old stack under the assumption that it fixed
> something for some device.
Yes, it's in the old driver. I haven't checked yet when and why it was
written that way. Will do so eventually.
Usually, the SBP-2 status block is used to communicate autosense data.
Targets which do so may not support REQUEST SENSE. Targets which don't
do so have to support REQUEST SENSE; I suppose sbp2's curious REQUEST
SENSE handling is badly broken for such devices as far as any exist.
> I took it out and tested with the 10 or so
> storage devices I have here and it makes no difference. I've never seen
> the fw_notify() that I put in there trigger. I'm taking out this
> workaround for now,
OK.
> unless someone can tell me why it should stay there.
>
> Kristian
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-==- ==-- -===-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-14 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-05 5:22 [PATCH 0/3] New firewire stack Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-05 5:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] Import fw-ohci driver Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-05 5:54 ` Pete Zaitcev
2006-12-05 5:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-12-05 6:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-09 2:08 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-09 7:31 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-10 21:47 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-10 22:59 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-10 23:00 ` alignment and packing of struct types (was Re: [PATCH 2/3] Import fw-ohci driver.) Stefan Richter
2006-12-05 5:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] Import fw-sbp2 driver Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-05 6:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-12-05 18:18 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-14 20:48 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-14 21:40 ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2006-12-15 15:08 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-15 18:27 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-05 5:42 ` [PATCH 0/3] New firewire stack Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-05 6:20 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-05 16:28 ` Ray Lee
2006-12-05 23:24 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-05 7:05 ` David Miller
2006-12-05 16:42 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-05 18:49 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-05 21:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-05 23:15 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-05 8:46 ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-12-05 15:13 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-05 15:30 ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-12-06 16:21 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2006-12-06 16:32 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-05 16:05 ` Erik Mouw
2006-07-12 14:56 ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-08 15:09 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-09 19:44 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-10 12:57 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-10 22:17 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-10 23:21 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-09 21:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-09 22:51 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-05 16:53 ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-12-05 23:27 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-05 18:49 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-12-05 19:53 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-05 23:21 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-06 5:35 ` Ben Collins
2006-12-06 8:56 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-06 11:40 ` Alexander Neundorf
2006-12-06 12:38 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-06 21:21 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-06 14:49 ` Ben Collins
2006-12-07 0:31 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-06 8:36 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-06 22:27 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2006-12-06 23:55 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-05 23:23 ` Olaf Hering
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4581C4D1.8090803@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=krh@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®