From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Cc: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Make entries in the "Device drivers" menu individually selectable
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:02:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4586AD83.5030600@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612180444230.16929@localhost.localdomain>
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, Stefan Richter wrote:
>> Works for me, but I don't see a lot of benefit from it. Actually I see
>> two disadvantages of the patch:
>
> ... snip ...
>
>> - There are two out-of-tree FireWire drivers for special purposes
^^^^^^^^^^^
>> (one bus sniffer, one remote debugging aid) which might perhaps be
>> candidates for integration into mainline. These drivers do not use
>> the ieee1394 base driver.
[...]
> i've noticed this sort of thing before -- submenus containing entries
> that don't actually depend on the top-level config variable. but
> which drivers are you talking about here?
As yet non-existent drivers. (Out-of-tree drivers.)
> i'm looking at the
> ieee1394/Kconfig file and every entry in that submenu appears to
> depend explicitly on IEEE1394.
Correct. What I described is purely hypothetical in case of
drivers/ieee1394. There surely are other submenus with actual
independent entries. But AFAIU you didn't touch such menus of course.
[...]
> in any event, as i mentioned earlier, i'm just trying to find a way to
> make the menu entries more obvious and more easily selectable, without
> having to enter each submenu to see what it represents.
[...]
Yes, this and the points you made in the other post are definitely valid.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-==- ==-- =--=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-18 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-14 8:31 Robert P. J. Day
2006-12-16 10:52 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-16 17:58 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-12-18 9:38 ` Robert P. J. Day
2006-12-18 9:50 ` Robert P. J. Day
2006-12-18 15:02 ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2006-12-18 15:31 ` Robert P. J. Day
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4586AD83.5030600@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®