Re: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.

[Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>]

Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> 
>>Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>
>>
>>>by adding (temporarily) the definitions of TRUE and FALSE to
>>>types.h, you should then (theoretically) be able to delete over
>>>100 instances of those same macros being *defined* throughout the
>>>source tree. you're not going to be deleting the hundreds and
>>>hundreds of *uses* of TRUE and FALSE (not yet, anyway) but, at the
>>>very least, by adding two lines to types.h, you can delete all
>>>those redundant *definitions* and make sure that nothing breaks.
>>>(it shouldn't, of course, but it's always nice to be sure.)
>>
>>Doesn't seem very worthwhile, and it legitimises this definition
>>we're trying to get rid of.
> 
> 
> hmmmmmmmm ... apparently, you totally missed my use of the important
> word "temporarily":

No, I didn't.

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com