mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org'" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"nico@fluxnic.net" <nico@fluxnic.net>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: RE: Domain faults when CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN is enabled
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 21:37:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45b615420548463ebd1d582bc5da2eff@EMAIL.axentia.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151203172708.GT8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

Russell King wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 04:41:18PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 04:12:06PM +0000, Peter Rosin wrote:
> > > * uaccess_with_memcpy.c:__copy_to_user() has a mode in which it copies
> > >   "non-atomically" (if faulthandler_disabled() returns 0). If a fault
> > >   happens during __copy_to_user, what prevents some other thread from
> > >   clobbering DACR?
> > 
> > See the second point above.  Moreover, if we sleep in down_read(),
> > then __switch_to() reads the current DACR value and saves it in the
> > thread information, and will restore that value when resuming the
> > thread - even if the thread has been migrated to a different CPU.
> 
> I thought this was correct, but it isn't - that's what my original solution
> did, but I think when Will reviewed it, we decided it wasn't necessary -
> and it isn't necessary for every single case with the exception of this
> one.  This is exactly what's going wrong: the down_read() in these paths
> calls into the scheduler, which switches away.  When we come back, the
> DACR value is reset by the other thread to 0x51.
> 
> There's a few ways to solve this:
> 
> 1. Make the thread switching code save and restore the DACR register as
>    it would do for domains.  This imposes an overhead on every single
>    context switch whether or not we happen to be in this _single_
>    troublesome code.  (Patch attached - as there's several, I'm attaching
>    them.)
> 
> 2. Add additional code to the uaccess-with-memcpy stuff to reset the
>    DACR value prior to using memcpy() or memset().  (Patch attached.)

I took both patches for a quick spin (a dozen boots and one hour uptime
after that for each patch) and no incidents. I have not gathered data,
but the crash on boot feels like it's quite a bit above 50% when there
is a problem so this feels good (I used 5 clean reboots when I bisected
and that worked).

Reported-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Tested-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>

(and please don't forget to cc stable)

> 3. Make uaccess-with-memcpy depend on !CPU_SW_DOMAINS_PAN (suggested by
>    Will)
> 
> 4. Delete the uaccess-with-memcpy code (also suggested by Will.)
> 
> I think the best thing I can do is say... "Discuss amongst yourselves" :)

I have no personal preference on what should be done, I only had
copy_to_user_memcpy enabled since that was what Atmel fed me.

Cheers,
Peter

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-03 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-03  8:33 Peter Rosin
2015-12-03 11:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-03 11:38   ` Peter Rosin
2015-12-03 11:51     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-03 12:08       ` Peter Rosin
2015-12-03 13:37         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-03 16:12           ` Peter Rosin
2015-12-03 16:41             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-03 17:27               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-03 18:28                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-12-05 13:41                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-03 21:37                 ` Peter Rosin [this message]
2015-12-10  0:22                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-10 15:29                     ` Peter Rosin
2015-12-10 16:20                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-10 18:32                         ` Peter Rosin
2015-12-30 16:51                         ` Peter Rosin
2015-12-30 16:57                         ` Peter Rosin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-12-03  7:43 Peter Rosin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45b615420548463ebd1d582bc5da2eff@EMAIL.axentia.se \
    --to=peda@axentia.se \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®